Nadia Al‐Dajani
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. Michael BagbyTara M. GralnickAmanda A. UliaszekEwa K. CzyzAdam G. HorwitzCheryl A. KingInbal Nahum‐ShaniVictor Hong
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyPsychological MedicineJournal of Affective Disorders
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Nadia Al‐Dajani
22 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Clinical Psychology 382
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
- Philosophy 77
- Social Psychology 65
- Applied Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Al‐Dajani
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Al‐Dajani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Al‐Dajani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Al‐Dajani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Al‐Dajani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Al‐Dajani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Al‐Dajani. The network helps show where Nadia Al‐Dajani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Al‐Dajani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Al‐Dajani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Al‐Dajani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Al‐Dajani. Nadia Al‐Dajani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 226 |
About Nadia Al‐Dajani
Nadia Al‐Dajani is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (382 citations), Applied Psychology (53 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations). Nadia Al‐Dajani has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include R. Michael Bagby, Tara M. Gralnick, Amanda A. Uliaszek, Ewa K. Czyz, Adam G. Horwitz, Cheryl A. King, Inbal Nahum‐Shani, Victor Hong, Lauren Zimmermann and Marc A. Fournier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.