Jeffrey Peipert

445 total citations
8 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Jeffrey Peipert is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jeffrey Peipert has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jeffrey Peipert's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). Jeffrey Peipert is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). Jeffrey Peipert collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jeffrey Peipert's co-authors include George A. Macones, Erika Stevens, Anthony Odibo, David M. Stamilio, Mary D. Sammel, Emmanuelle Paré, Sarah J. Ratcliffe, Deborah B. Nelson, Anthony Sciscione and Michal A. Elovitz and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of women's health.

In The Last Decade

Jeffrey Peipert

8 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jeffrey Peipert United States	5	283	247	173	20	19	8	306
Rosalind Janik United States	4	474 1.7×	399 1.6×	252 1.5×	27 1.4×	45 2.4×	5	493
PJ Danielian United Kingdom	5	233 0.8×	198 0.8×	94 0.5×	9 0.5×	30 1.6×	8	261
D. Ofili‐Yebovi United Kingdom	9	280 1.0×	383 1.6×	435 2.5×	25 1.3×	13 0.7×	16	562
Grace Yeung Canada	4	227 0.8×	151 0.6×	101 0.6×	19 0.9×	22 1.2×	12	269
E. Closset France	9	197 0.7×	179 0.7×	95 0.5×	27 1.4×	28 1.5×	18	251
William Wing Kee To China	9	152 0.5×	190 0.8×	115 0.7×	40 2.0×	12 0.6×	26	249
Stefania Livio Italy	8	197 0.7×	230 0.9×	72 0.4×	23 1.1×	24 1.3×	10	310
Jane Rogers United Kingdom	4	155 0.5×	165 0.7×	97 0.6×	12 0.6×	5 0.3×	4	205
Stine Bernitz Norway	11	304 1.1×	254 1.0×	111 0.6×	8 0.4×	38 2.0×	25	340
F P J Vrouenraets Netherlands	4	288 1.0×	234 0.9×	139 0.8×	9 0.5×	19 1.0×	5	313

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Peipert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Peipert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Peipert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Peipert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Peipert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Peipert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Peipert. The network helps show where Jeffrey Peipert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey Peipert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey Peipert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey Peipert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey Peipert. Jeffrey Peipert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Macones, George A., Alison G. Cahill, David M. Stamilio, et al.. (2006). Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 195(4). 1148–1152. 63 indexed citations

Macones, George A., Jeffrey Peipert, Deborah B. Nelson, et al.. (2005). Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 193(5). 1656–1662. 221 indexed citations

Cahill, Alison G., David M. Stamilio, Anthony O. Odibo, et al.. (2005). Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in woman with a prior vaginal delivery?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 193(6). S123–S123. 1 indexed citations

Paré, Emmanuelle, David M. Stamilio, Alison G. Cahill, et al.. (2004). Maternal morbidity with elective repeat cesarean section: The influence of the number of previous cesarean sections. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 191(6). S153–S153. 2 indexed citations

Dunsmoor-Su, Rebecca, Mary D. Sammel, Erika Stevens, Jeffrey Peipert, & George A. Macones. (2003). Impact of Sociodemographic and Hospital Factors on Attempts at Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 102(6). 1358–1365. 9 indexed citations

Gibson, Paul, Raymond Powrie, & Jeffrey Peipert. (2001). Prevalence of Syncope and Recurrent Presyncope During Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 97(Supplement). 41S–42S. 5 indexed citations

Elkousy, Mohammed, et al.. (2001). 464 Mothers with macrosomic fetuses should not be discouraged from vaginal birth after cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 185(6). S209–S209. 1 indexed citations

Cu‐Uvin, Susan, et al.. (1994). Cervical Cytologie Abnormalities in HIV-Seropositive Women: Cytologie and Histologie Correlation. Journal of women's health. 3(3). 179–184. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact