B. W. J. Mol

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 903 citations indexed

About

B. W. J. Mol is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, B. W. J. Mol has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 903 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in B. W. J. Mol's work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). B. W. J. Mol is often cited by papers focused on Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). B. W. J. Mol collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. B. W. J. Mol's co-authors include Arri Coomarasamy, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Joris van der Post, Jos Kleijnen, Patrick Bindels, R. Katie Morris, Stephen C. Robson, Jeltsje S. Cnossen, Khalid S. Khan and Gerben ter Riet and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, Human Reproduction and Human Reproduction Update.

In The Last Decade

B. W. J. Mol

10 papers receiving 849 citations

Hit Papers

Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict ... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

B. W. J. Mol
Luís Alonso Pacheco United States
Ron Sagiv Israel
Martin C Sowter New Zealand
Christina M. Duzyj United States
P. Dar United States
Y. Abdallah United Kingdom
Beatrice Mosimann Switzerland
Luís Alonso Pacheco United States
B. W. J. Mol
Citations per year, relative to B. W. J. Mol B. W. J. Mol (= 1×) peers Luís Alonso Pacheco

Countries citing papers authored by B. W. J. Mol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. W. J. Mol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. W. J. Mol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. W. J. Mol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. W. J. Mol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. W. J. Mol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. W. J. Mol. The network helps show where B. W. J. Mol may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. W. J. Mol

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. W. J. Mol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. W. J. Mol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. W. J. Mol. B. W. J. Mol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Kok, N., et al.. (2014). Sonographic Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Predict Uterine Rupture During a Trial of Labor in Women With Previous Cesarean Section. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 69(3). 123–124. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vansenne, Fleur, et al.. (2013). Economic analysis of chromosome testing in couples with recurrent miscarriage to prevent handicapped offspring. Human Reproduction. 28(7). 1737–1742. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hompes, Peter G.A., et al.. (2013). Cost‐effectiveness of tubal patency tests. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 120(5). 583–593. 11 indexed citations
4.
Musters, Anne, Jan A.M. Kremer, B. W. J. Mol, et al.. (2012). Tailored expectant management: a nationwide survey to quantify patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators. Human Reproduction. 27(4). 1050–1057. 8 indexed citations
5.
Verhaegen, Jan, Ioannis Gallos, Norah M. van Mello, et al.. (2012). Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 345(sep27 4). e6077–e6077. 78 indexed citations
6.
Broeze, K. A., Brent C. Opmeer, S.F.P.J. Coppus, et al.. (2012). Integration of patient characteristics and the results of Chlamydia antibody testing and hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Human Reproduction. 27(10). 2979–2990. 8 indexed citations
7.
Weyers, Steven, Patrick Puttemans, Costas Panayotidis, et al.. (2009). The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update. 16(1). 1–11. 140 indexed citations
8.
Cnossen, Jeltsje S., R. Katie Morris, Gerben ter Riet, et al.. (2008). Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 178(6). 701–711. 500 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Mol, B. W. J.. (2007). Evaluatieonderzoek in de Nederlandse verloskunde: Uitvoering van 6 gerandomiseerde trials binnen een landelijk netwerk. 151(13). 771–775.
10.
Mol, B. W. J.. (1999). Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Human Reproduction. 14(5). 1237–1242. 131 indexed citations
11.
Mol, B. W. J.. (1997). Screening for Ectopic Pregnancy in Symptom-Free Women at Increased Risk. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 89(5). 704–707. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026