This map shows the geographic impact of N. Haq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Haq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Haq more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Haq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Haq. The network helps show where N. Haq may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Haq
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Haq.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Haq based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with N. Haq. N. Haq is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dumet, D., et al.. (2008). The potentials of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst. Ex. A. Rich) in Nigeria: character distribution and genetic diversity.. 265–276.1 indexed citations
5.
Smartt, J., et al.. (2008). Status and market potential of traditional leafy vegetables (Marogo) in South Africa.. 434–439.1 indexed citations
6.
Virchow, Detlef, J. Smartt, & N. Haq. (2008). Indigenous vegetables in East Africa: sorted out, forgotten, revitalised and successful.. 79–100.4 indexed citations
7.
Williams, John Trevor & N. Haq. (2002). Global research on underutilized crops: An assessment of current activities and proposals for enhanced cooperation. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).66 indexed citations
8.
Haq, N., et al.. (2002). Fruits for the future: Baobab (Factsheet number 4). ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
9.
Haq, N., et al.. (2002). Fruits for the Future in Asia.8 indexed citations
HUGHES, A. P. & N. Haq. (1999). Annonaceae: Fruits for the future. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
12.
Moon, H. P., et al.. (1999). Variability and interrelations in rice under cold stress environments. 36(1). 1–4.3 indexed citations
13.
Smartt, J. & N. Haq. (1997). Domestication, production and utilisation of new crops. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
14.
Haq, N., et al.. (1995). Genetic resources and utilization of underutilized crops in Southern and Eastern Africa. Proceedings of Symposium held at the Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Crops Nelspruit, South Africa, August 1995. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
15.
Groot, Peter de & N. Haq. (1995). Promotion of traditional and underutilized crops. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
16.
Okigbo, B. N., G. E. Wickens, N. Haq, & Peter Day. (1989). New crops for food and industry: the roots and tubers in tropical Africa.. 123–134.3 indexed citations
17.
Galwey, N. W., G. E. Wickens, N. Haq, & Peter Day. (1989). Chenopodium grains of the Andes: a crop for temperate latitudes.. 222–234.10 indexed citations
18.
Byth, D. E., et al.. (1989). New crops; a suggested framework for their selection, evaluation and commercial development.. 36–52.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.