John Trevor Williams

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 994 citations indexed

About

John Trevor Williams is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John Trevor Williams has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 994 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in John Trevor Williams's work include Seed and Plant Biochemistry (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (3 papers) and Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (3 papers). John Trevor Williams is often cited by papers focused on Seed and Plant Biochemistry (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (3 papers) and Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (3 papers). John Trevor Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Fiji. John Trevor Williams's co-authors include John L. Harper, G. R. Sagar, C. F. Shaykewich, Joseph Holden, N. Haq, H. D. Tindall, G. J. H. Grubben, David M. Brenner, N Collis-George and A. N. Rao and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Ecology, Journal of Experimental Botany and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

In The Last Decade

John Trevor Williams

17 papers receiving 725 citations

Hit Papers

The Behaviour of Seeds in... 1965 2026 1985 2005 1965 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Trevor Williams United States 13 540 311 225 203 103 19 994
Kenneth B. Marcum United States 19 855 1.6× 425 1.4× 149 0.7× 339 1.7× 41 0.4× 40 1.4k
C. B. Davey United States 22 796 1.5× 222 0.7× 134 0.6× 137 0.7× 32 0.3× 93 1.3k
R. C. Shearman United States 22 814 1.5× 416 1.3× 226 1.0× 413 2.0× 38 0.4× 95 1.6k
A. M. Wilson United States 15 514 1.0× 293 0.9× 140 0.6× 268 1.3× 22 0.2× 41 859
Edmundo García‐Moya Mexico 18 539 1.0× 333 1.1× 255 1.1× 210 1.0× 301 2.9× 141 1.2k
F. L. Milthorpe United Kingdom 19 999 1.9× 139 0.4× 163 0.7× 67 0.3× 114 1.1× 47 1.3k
Jean‐Marc Bouvet France 19 387 0.7× 316 1.0× 148 0.7× 125 0.6× 85 0.8× 56 987
M. A. Sprague Netherlands 14 578 1.1× 107 0.3× 159 0.7× 84 0.4× 44 0.4× 35 996
George C.J. Fernandez United States 17 1.0k 1.9× 110 0.4× 93 0.4× 144 0.7× 79 0.8× 50 1.8k
A. Burkart Argentina 9 484 0.9× 188 0.6× 395 1.8× 89 0.4× 191 1.9× 15 993

Countries citing papers authored by John Trevor Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Trevor Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Trevor Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Trevor Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Trevor Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Trevor Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Trevor Williams. The network helps show where John Trevor Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Trevor Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Trevor Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Trevor Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Trevor Williams. John Trevor Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Williams, John Trevor & N. Haq. (2002). Global research on underutilized crops: An assessment of current activities and proposals for enhanced cooperation. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 66 indexed citations
2.
Williams, John Trevor, et al.. (1998). Priority species of bamboo and rattan. 44 indexed citations
3.
Rao, A. N., et al.. (1997). Role of bamboo, rattan and medicinal plants in mountain development : proceedings of a workshop held at the Institute of Forestry, Pokhara, Nepal, 15-17 May 1996. 3 indexed citations
4.
Williams, John Trevor & David M. Brenner. (1995). Grain amaranth (Amaranthus species). Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 32 indexed citations
5.
Williams, John Trevor, et al.. (1995). Healing forests, healing people : report of a Workshop on Medicinal Plants, held on 6-8 February, 1995, Calicut, India. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
6.
Williams, John Trevor. (1993). Pulses and vegetables.. Chapman & Hall eBooks. 24 indexed citations
7.
Williams, John Trevor, et al.. (1992). Los bancos genéticos y la alimentación mundial. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).
8.
Holden, Joseph & John Trevor Williams. (1985). Crop Genetic Resources: Conservation and Evaluation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 89 indexed citations
9.
Hawkes, J. G., et al.. (1983). A bibliography of crop genetic resources.
10.
Grubben, G. J. H., H. D. Tindall, & John Trevor Williams. (1977). Tropical vegetables and their genetic resources. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 71 indexed citations
11.
Williams, John Trevor. (1974). Root Density and Water Potential Gradients near the Plant Root. Journal of Experimental Botany. 25(4). 669–674. 17 indexed citations
12.
Shaykewich, C. F. & John Trevor Williams. (1971). Resistance to Water Absorption in Germinating Rapeseed (Brassica napusL.). Journal of Experimental Botany. 22(1). 19–24. 17 indexed citations
13.
Williams, John Trevor & C. F. Shaykewich. (1971). Influence of Soil Water Matric Potential and Hydraulic Conductivity on the Germination of Rape (Brassica napusL.). Journal of Experimental Botany. 22(3). 586–597. 28 indexed citations
14.
Shaykewich, C. F. & John Trevor Williams. (1971). Influence of Hydraulic Properties of Soil on Pre‐Germination Water Absorption by Rapeseed (Brassica napus)1. Agronomy Journal. 63(3). 454–457. 4 indexed citations
15.
Williams, John Trevor & C. F. Shaykewich. (1970). The Influence of Soil Water Matric Potential on the Strength Properties of Unsaturated Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 34(6). 835–840. 32 indexed citations
16.
Williams, John Trevor & C. F. Shaykewich. (1969). AN EVALUATION OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL (P.E.G.) 6000 AND P.E.G. 20,000 IN THE OSMOTIC CONTROL OF SOIL WATER MATRIC POTENTIAL. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 49(3). 397–401. 64 indexed citations
17.
Collis-George, N & John Trevor Williams. (1968). Comparison of the effects of soil matric potential and isotropic effective stress on the germination of Lactuca sativa. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 6(2). 179–192. 20 indexed citations
18.
Williams, John Trevor. (1967). Comparison of Maze Learning on Spatial and Confounded Discriminations by Caimans and Toads. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 25(2). 585–588. 5 indexed citations
19.
Harper, John L., John Trevor Williams, & G. R. Sagar. (1965). The Behaviour of Seeds in Soil: I. The Heterogeneity of Soil surfaces and its Role in Determining the Establishment of Plants from Seed. Journal of Ecology. 53(2). 273–273. 475 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026