N. E. Day

5.0k total citations · 3 hit papers
35 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

N. E. Day is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, N. E. Day has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in N. E. Day's work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers). N. E. Day is often cited by papers focused on Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers). N. E. Day collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. N. E. Day's co-authors include Richard G. Cornell, Kay‐Tee Khaw, Robert Luben, Ailsa Welch, Sheila Bingham, S. Bingham, N J Wareham, Suzy Oakes, Timothy J. Key and Aedín Cassidy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Gut.

In The Last Decade

N. E. Day

35 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

1999 640 citations N. E. Day, Robert Luben et al. PubMed profile →
Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records

1994 595 citations Sheila Bingham, C. Gill et al. British Journal Of Nutrition profile →
Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies.

1992 585 citations Richard G. Cornell, N. E. Day et al. Journal of the American Statistical Association profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
N. E. Day United Kingdom	22	1.2k	776	617	545	525	35	4.0k
Arthur Schatzkin United States	43	1.2k 1.0×	1.3k 1.7×	695 1.1×	642 1.2×	651 1.2×	84	4.2k
Traci Mouw United States	22	1.3k 1.1×	987 1.3×	1.1k 1.7×	708 1.3×	491 0.9×	27	4.1k
Lisa B. Signorello United States	43	1.5k 1.2×	960 1.2×	667 1.1×	924 1.7×	610 1.2×	114	5.7k
D Trichopoulos Greece	33	1.5k 1.2×	1.3k 1.7×	466 0.8×	368 0.7×	237 0.5×	77	4.9k
Flora Lubin Israel	32	1.1k 0.9×	1.1k 1.4×	497 0.8×	321 0.6×	211 0.4×	65	3.7k
Ole Møller Jensen Denmark	37	1.1k 0.8×	1.7k 2.2×	418 0.7×	934 1.7×	493 0.9×	70	4.8k
J Boreham United Kingdom	21	726 0.6×	578 0.7×	1.2k 2.0×	357 0.7×	598 1.1×	30	3.9k
Ann Chao United States	38	1.0k 0.8×	1.9k 2.4×	751 1.2×	713 1.3×	664 1.3×	66	5.1k
Kristine R. Monroe United States	33	1.2k 1.0×	1.1k 1.4×	832 1.3×	474 0.9×	416 0.8×	85	4.0k
Marie M. Cantwell United Kingdom	43	1.0k 0.8×	1.4k 1.8×	639 1.0×	945 1.7×	691 1.3×	105	4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by N. E. Day

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. E. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. E. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. E. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. E. Day

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. E. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. E. Day. The network helps show where N. E. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. E. Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. E. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. E. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. E. Day. N. E. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Miotto, Olivo, R. van der Pluijm, Lorenz von Seidlein, et al.. (2018). TRAVEL PATTERNS OF PATIENTS WITH MALARIA IN THE GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION AND NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES IN SOUTH ASIA. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 99. 14–14. 1 indexed citations

Sinha, Sanjay, Robert Luben, Ailsa Welch, et al.. (2005). Fibrinogen and cigarette smoking in men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) population. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 12(2). 144–150. 23 indexed citations

Dunning, Alison M., Mitch Dowsett, Catherine S. Healey, et al.. (2004). Polymorphisms Associated With Circulating Sex Hormone Levels in Postmenopausal Women. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 96(12). 936–945. 278 indexed citations

Day, N. E., K-T Khaw, S. Bingham, et al.. (2004). Habitual fish consumption and glycated haemoglobin: The EPIC-Norfolk Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 58(2). 277–284. 21 indexed citations

Fraser, Gary E., A Welch, Robert Luben, Sheila Bingham, & N. E. Day. (2000). The Effect of Age, Sex, and Education on Food Consumption of a Middle-Aged English Cohort—EPIC in East Anglia. Preventive Medicine. 30(1). 26–34. 113 indexed citations

Wilmink, A, Catherine S. Hubbard, N. E. Day, & Clive R.G. Quick. (2000). Effect of propanolol on the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized study. British journal of surgery. 87(4). 499–499. 22 indexed citations

Kennedy, H J, et al.. (2000). How frequently do large bowel diverticula perforate? An incidence and cross-sectional study. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 12(6). 661–665. 81 indexed citations

Gore, S M, S. Bingham, & N. E. Day. (1997). Age related dietary exposure to meat products from British dietary surveys of teenagers and adults in the 1980s and 1990s: Table 1. BMJ. 315(7105). 404–405. 14 indexed citations

Duffy, Stephen W., Chien‐Jen Chen, Làszló Tabár, & N. E. Day. (1995). Estimation of mean sojourn time in breast cancer screening using a Markov chain model of both entry to and exit from the preclinical detectable phase. Statistics in Medicine. 14(14). 1531–1543. 169 indexed citations

10.

Bingham, Sheila, Aedín Cassidy, Tim Cole, et al.. (1995). Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. British Journal Of Nutrition. 73(4). 531–550. 309 indexed citations

11.

Bingham, Sheila, C. Gill, A Welch, et al.. (1994). Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. British Journal Of Nutrition. 72(4). 619–643. 595 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Byrne, Christopher D., Chris Palmer, D. R. R. Williams, et al.. (1994). Hypertriglyceridaemia in subjects with normal and abnormal glucose tolerance: relative contributions of insulin secretion, insulin resistance and suppression of plasma non-esterified fatty acids. Diabetologia. 37(9). 889–896. 3 indexed citations

13.

McCredie, Margaret, John H. Stewart, & N. E. Day. (1993). Different roles for phenacetin and paracetamol in cancer of the kidney and renal pelvis. International Journal of Cancer. 53(2). 245–249. 70 indexed citations

14.

Cornell, Richard G., et al.. (1992). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II: The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies.. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 87(418). 590–590. 585 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Day, N. E., et al.. (1989). Predictions of the aids epidemic in the U.K.: The use of the back projection method. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 325(1226). 123–134. 20 indexed citations

16.

Gourley, L. M., et al.. (1988). A survey of household food purchases and dietary habits in relation to affluence among Singapore Chinese.. PubMed. 42(4). 333–43. 8 indexed citations

17.

Duffy, S W, et al.. (1988). Recent trends in cancer incidence among Singapore Chinese. International Journal of Cancer. 42(2). 159–166. 36 indexed citations

18.

Day, N. E., et al.. (1975). Dietary factors and esophageal cancer in the Caspian Littoral of Iran.. PubMed. 35(11 Pt. 2). 3493–8. 89 indexed citations

19.

Day, N. E., et al.. (1972). The relationship between the ingestion of hot coffee and intraoesophageal temperature. Gut. 13(1). 24–30. 42 indexed citations

20.

Wassermann, M., et al.. (1972). Storage of organochlorine insecticides in the adipose tissue of people from Thailand.. PubMed. 3(2). 280–5. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact