Morven C. Shearer
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- James W. FawcettRichard AsherKathryn H. AdcockDaniel A. MorgensternPenka PeshevaDavid J. BrownSimone P. NiclouJoel M. Levine
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers)Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (4 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTanzaniaGermany
In The Last Decade
Morven C. Shearer
13 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 390
- Developmental Neuroscience 207
- Cell Biology 149
- Molecular Biology 144
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 116
Countries citing papers authored by Morven C. Shearer
This map shows the geographic impact of Morven C. Shearer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morven C. Shearer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morven C. Shearer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Morven C. Shearer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morven C. Shearer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morven C. Shearer. The network helps show where Morven C. Shearer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morven C. Shearer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morven C. Shearer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morven C. Shearer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Morven C. Shearer. Morven C. Shearer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Implementing a new interdisciplinary module: the challenges and the benefits of working across disciplines | 1 |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 93 | |
| 12 | 221 | |
| 13 | 143 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Morven C. Shearer
Morven C. Shearer is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Toxicology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (207 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (390 citations) and Cell Biology (149 citations). Morven C. Shearer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James W. Fawcett, Richard Asher, Kathryn H. Adcock, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Penka Pesheva, David J. Brown, Simone P. Niclou, Joel M. Levine, Anthony Holtmaat and Joost Verhaagen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Scientific Reports and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.