George M. Smith

7.8k citations
129 papers · 6.1k indexed · h-index 47

Impact in

Papers in

George M. Smith

128 papers receiving 6.0k citations

Peers

George M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Developmental Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.5k
  • Neurology 579
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.2k
  • Cell Biology 719
Replace Lawrence Moon with:
Lawrence Moon United Kingdom
Hans Werner Müller Germany
Elizabeth J. Bradbury United Kingdom
Patrick M. Wood United States
Susan C. Barnett United Kingdom
Von R. King United Kingdom
Leonard L. Jones United States
Marie T. Filbin United States
Lisa McKerracher Canada
John D. Houlé United States
George M. Smith relative to Lawrence Moon United Kingdom Lawrence Moon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lawrence Moon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George M. Smith. The network helps show where George M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together George M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 202112
3 20214
4 201923
5 20189
6 201796
7 2017126
8 201410
9 201399
10 201321
11 201197
12 201152
13 200848
14 200733
15 200722
16 200779
17 200656
18 200081
19 199333
20 198865

About George M. Smith

George M. Smith is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 129 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (71 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (42 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (29 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (27 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (10 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (9 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.5k citations), Neurology (579 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.2k citations) and Cell Biology (719 citations). George M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Miller, Jerry Silver, Gianluca Gallo, Kathleen M. Keefe, Imran S. Sheikh, Kevin D. Nelson, Célia Maria Cássaro Strunz, Darrell L. Tanelian, Urs Rutishauser and Xiaoqing Tang. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE, European Journal of Neuroscience and Journal of Neurotrauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026