Morag Prowse

570 citations
20 papers · 422 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers)Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers)Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers)
Partner nations
United Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Morag Prowse

20 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Morag Prowse
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Health Professions 202
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 111
  • Surgery 49
  • Education 45
  • Emergency Medical Services 39
Replace Donna D. Ignatavicius with:
Donna D. Ignatavicius United States
Linda Bucher United States
Joan Norris United States
Marietta P. Stanton United States
Chad Epps United States
Nuran Tosun Türkiye
Maxine Duke Australia
Kathy A. Baker United States
Ingibjörg Hjaltadóttir Iceland
Priscilla LeMone United States
Morag Prowse relative to Donna D. Ignatavicius United States Donna D. Ignatavicius's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Donna D. Ignatavicius · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Morag Prowse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morag Prowse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morag Prowse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morag Prowse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Morag Prowse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morag Prowse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morag Prowse. The network helps show where Morag Prowse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morag Prowse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morag Prowse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morag Prowse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Morag Prowse. Morag Prowse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 18
2 2
3 26
4 27
5 39
6 29
7 3
8 1
9 25
10 79
11 5
12
Learning and using biosciences in nursing Part Two: achieving patient outcomes in perioperative practice.
7
13 17
14 73
15 29
16 14
17 2
18 17
19 8
20
Toward 2001. The recovery room revisited.
1

About Morag Prowse

Morag Prowse is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Family Practice, having authored 20 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (35 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations) and General Health Professions (202 citations). Morag Prowse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine Webb, Lesley Lowes, Patricia Lyne, Ray Jones, Rohini Terry, Eric E. Brodie, Catherine A. Niven, Sherrill Snelgrove, David Hughes and Davina Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026