Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation
2011426 citationsMona BakerResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Baker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Baker. The network helps show where Mona Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mona Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mona Baker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mona Baker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mona Baker. Mona Baker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baker, Mona, et al.. (2020). Genealogies of Knowledge. Palgrave Communications.1 indexed citations
9.
Baker, Mona, et al.. (2019). TRADUÇÃO E TRANSFORMAÇÃO SOCIAL: UMA ENTREVISTA COM MONA BAKER TRANSLATION AND SOCIAL CHANGE: AN INTERVIEW WITH MONA BAKER. 9(21). 14–35.1 indexed citations
Baker, Mona. (2010). Critical Readings in Translation Studies. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).125 indexed citations
12.
Baker, Mona, et al.. (2009). The Interpretive approach. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 145–147.2 indexed citations
13.
Baker, Mona. (2008). Ethics of Renarration: Mona Baker Is Interviewed by Andrew Chesterman. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1(1). 10–33.37 indexed citations
14.
Baker, Mona. (2005). Translation and context. Journal of Pragmatics. 38(3). 317–320.5 indexed citations
15.
Baker, Mona. (2003). Corpus-based Translation Studies in the Academy. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 5. 50–55.1 indexed citations
16.
Baker, Mona. (2002). 'Corpus-based Studies within the Larger Context of Translation Studies'. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
Baker, Mona. (2001). Issues in Translation Research and Their Relevance to Professional Practice.1 indexed citations
19.
Morton, A. Q., et al.. (1996). Analysing for authorship : a guide to the cusum technique. University of Wales Press eBooks.25 indexed citations
20.
Baker, Mona. (1995). Corpora in Translation Studies. Target International Journal of Translation Studies. 7(2). 223–243.214 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.