M.L. Chatterjee

737 total citations
47 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

M.L. Chatterjee is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Plant Science and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, M.L. Chatterjee has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 17 papers in Plant Science and 15 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in M.L. Chatterjee's work include Nuclear physics research studies (19 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (15 papers) and Agricultural pest management studies (14 papers). M.L. Chatterjee is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (19 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (15 papers) and Agricultural pest management studies (14 papers). M.L. Chatterjee collaborates with scholars based in India, Canada and United States. M.L. Chatterjee's co-authors include P. Basu, B. Dasmahapatra, M. Saha Sarkar, S. Bhattacharya, A. Mukherjee, U. Datta Pramanik, A. Goswami, S. Chattopadhyay, P. Bhattacharya and Arunava Samanta and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

M.L. Chatterjee

44 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.L. Chatterjee India 9 174 112 78 63 52 47 268
Nick Bateman United States 12 187 1.1× 60 0.5× 141 1.8× 20 0.3× 20 0.4× 25 329
L. M. Pant India 8 125 0.7× 47 0.4× 54 0.7× 92 1.5× 26 0.5× 18 233
Indu Bala India 9 229 1.3× 83 0.7× 157 2.0× 56 0.9× 45 0.9× 42 312
Christopher Prior United Kingdom 8 62 0.4× 24 0.2× 17 0.2× 31 0.5× 102 2.0× 39 205
V. Filippini Italy 7 64 0.4× 81 0.7× 24 0.3× 6 0.1× 10 0.2× 29 171
P. von Doetinchem United States 11 230 1.3× 44 0.4× 33 0.4× 5 0.1× 14 0.3× 24 296
Carlo Schmidt Germany 6 43 0.2× 60 0.5× 51 0.7× 11 0.2× 8 0.2× 10 143
S. K. Matthews United States 6 84 0.5× 11 0.1× 47 0.6× 23 0.4× 8 0.2× 9 120
J. Schwandt Germany 11 169 1.0× 159 1.4× 28 0.4× 13 0.2× 3 0.1× 51 350

Countries citing papers authored by M.L. Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.L. Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.L. Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.L. Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.L. Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.L. Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.L. Chatterjee. The network helps show where M.L. Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.L. Chatterjee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.L. Chatterjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.L. Chatterjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.L. Chatterjee. M.L. Chatterjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Daim, Tuğrul, et al.. (2024). An Evaluation Framework for Machine Learning and Data Science-Based Financial Strategies: A Case Study-Driven Decision Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 72. 349–362. 3 indexed citations
2.
Sikdar, Samir Ranjan, et al.. (2019). Diurnal foraging activity of flower visiting insects on some seed spices under terai agroclimatic zone of West Bengal. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 7(4). 299–303. 2 indexed citations
3.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2018). Evaluation of a new ready mixed insecticide (buprofezin 15% + acephate 35% WP) against BPH (Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)) and WBPH (Sogatella furcifera (Horvath)) of rice in West Bengal.. Journal of Crop and Weed. 14(1). 205–211. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mandal, Dipak K., et al.. (2014). Studies on the infestation levels by melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett, on pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.) and bitter gourd (Momordica charantia Linn.) in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Journal of Entomological Research. 38(3). 195–200. 1 indexed citations
5.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Bio-efficacy of neonicotinoids against Aphis gossypii Glover of okra.. Journal of Crop and Weed. 9(2). 181–184. 9 indexed citations
6.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Bioefficacy of imidacloprid 17.8 SL against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in brinjal.. 5(1). 37–41. 2 indexed citations
7.
Mandal, Dipak K., et al.. (2013). Determination of relative toxicity and base line data of dif-ferent insecticides against cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley).. 5(1). 26–31. 2 indexed citations
8.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Population dynamics of major insect pests and their natural enemies on cabbage under new alluvial zone of West Bengal.. 5(1). 42–49. 8 indexed citations
9.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Management of okra yellow vein mosaic virus by chemical control of Bemisia tabaci gennadius. Indian Journal of Entomology. 75(3). 236–238. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ghosh, Amalendu, et al.. (2013). Sulfoximine: A novel insecticide for management of rice brown planthopper in India. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(38). 4798–4803. 3 indexed citations
11.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Field efficacy and economics of some insecticides against spotted pod borer (Maruca testulalis Geyer) of black gram. Journal of Crop and Weed. 9(2). 177–180. 4 indexed citations
12.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of imidacloprid 17.8 SL against brinjal jassid, Cestius phycitis. Journal of Entomological Research. 37(4). 319–323. 1 indexed citations
13.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2012). Studies on some insecticides with novel mode of action for the management of tomato fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hub.).. Journal of Crop and Weed. 8(2). 126–129. 6 indexed citations
14.
Mandal, Dipak K., et al.. (2012). Evaluation of new and conventional insecticides for the management of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rapeseed (Brassica juncea L.).. 4(2). 37–42. 6 indexed citations
15.
Chatterjee, M.L., et al.. (2009). Field Efficacy of Insecticides for management of Earias vittella in Okra. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 17(2). 471–472. 7 indexed citations
16.
Das, Sudhir Kumar, et al.. (2000). Efficacy of some new insecticides against Earias vittella (F.) infestation on okra and cost benefit analysis.. 8(1). 99–101. 2 indexed citations
17.
Nath, P., et al.. (2000). Effect of intercropping and spacing of linseed with mustard and tomato on the incidence of insect pests. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
18.
Saha, S., et al.. (1999). Quasielastic reactions around the coulomb barrier in 16O+118Sn. Pramana. 53(3). 553–557. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pramanik, U. Datta, A. Mukherjee, P. Basu, et al.. (1998). Oblate bands in doubly odd 134La. Nuclear Physics A. 637(3). 327–345. 6 indexed citations
20.
Beeley, Philip, L. Yaffe, M.L. Chatterjee, H. Dautet, & J.K.P. Lee. (1983). Isotopic and neutron yields of products from the asymmetric and near-symmetric proton-induced fission ofU233andU235. Physical Review C. 28(3). 1188–1205. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026