Mitchell S. Tepper

696 citations
17 papers · 478 indexed · h-index 10

Mitchell S. Tepper

17 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Mitchell S. Tepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Safety Research 252
  • Gender Studies 102
  • Health 61
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 104
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 111
Replace Linda R. Mona with:
Linda R. Mona United States
Ilana Duvdevany Israel
Laurie Powers United States
Phyllis A. Gordon United States
Chaya Schwartz Israel
Sharon Dale Stone Canada
Aldred H. Neufeldt Canada
David Vandergoot United States
Jennifer James United States
Marsha Saxton United States
Mitchell S. Tepper relative to Linda R. Mona United States Linda R. Mona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Linda R. Mona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell S. Tepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell S. Tepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell S. Tepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell S. Tepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell S. Tepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell S. Tepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell S. Tepper. The network helps show where Mitchell S. Tepper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell S. Tepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mitchell S. Tepper Line = papers co-authored together Mitchell S. Tepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20203
2 201729
3 201527
4 20145
5 20129
6
Moral and cultural foundations
20073
7 200122
8
Lived experiences that impede or facilitate sexual pleasure and orgasm in people with spinal cord injury
20018
9 2000179
10 199948
11 199731
12 19978
13 19972
14 19972
15 199739
16 199621
17 199242

About Mitchell S. Tepper

Mitchell S. Tepper is a scholar working on Safety Research, Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Gender Studies and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (8 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Research in Social Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (252 citations), Gender Studies (102 citations), Health (61 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (111 citations). Mitchell S. Tepper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Beverly Whipple, Barry R. Komisaruk, Tami S. Rowen, Frédérique Courtois, Stacy Elliott, Marcalee Alexander, David Satcher, Sigmund Hough, Colleen Cordes and Linda R. Mona. Their work appears in journals such as Sexuality and Disability, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, The Journal of Sexual Medicine and International Journal of Sexual Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026