Mitchell McMaster

476 total citations
15 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Mitchell McMaster is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mitchell McMaster has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mitchell McMaster's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). Mitchell McMaster is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). Mitchell McMaster collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Mitchell McMaster's co-authors include Elaine Fielding, Elizabeth Beattie, Sarang Kim, Susan J. Torres, Kaarin J. Anstey, Catherine D’Este, Maria OʼReilly, Linda Clare, Nicolas Cherbuin and Margaret MacAndrew and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Mitchell McMaster

15 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mitchell McMaster Australia 9 146 91 54 34 34 15 268
Mateus Dias Antunes Brazil 9 96 0.7× 69 0.8× 32 0.6× 22 0.6× 21 0.6× 90 274
Sarah‐Gabrielle Béland Canada 10 124 0.8× 40 0.4× 30 0.6× 50 1.5× 68 2.0× 16 329
Timothy R. Malloy United States 5 122 0.8× 85 0.9× 57 1.1× 31 0.9× 30 0.9× 7 281
Amy Streater United Kingdom 10 278 1.9× 132 1.5× 37 0.7× 75 2.2× 27 0.8× 22 377
Jochen Werle Germany 7 130 0.9× 59 0.6× 35 0.6× 19 0.6× 40 1.2× 9 286
L. Lechowski France 11 250 1.7× 114 1.3× 25 0.5× 25 0.7× 44 1.3× 23 394
María Gómez-Gallego Spain 10 134 0.9× 104 1.1× 20 0.4× 49 1.4× 13 0.4× 17 296
Catherine S. Fontaine United States 3 255 1.7× 152 1.7× 75 1.4× 46 1.4× 45 1.3× 4 355
Hugo de Waal United Kingdom 5 174 1.2× 109 1.2× 48 0.9× 50 1.5× 8 0.2× 10 291
Fabrizio Giunco Italy 7 76 0.5× 45 0.5× 54 1.0× 18 0.5× 52 1.5× 23 244

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell McMaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell McMaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell McMaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell McMaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell McMaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell McMaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell McMaster. The network helps show where Mitchell McMaster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell McMaster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell McMaster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell McMaster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell McMaster. Mitchell McMaster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
McMaster, Mitchell, Sarang Kim, Linda Clare, et al.. (2023). The feasibility of a multidomain dementia risk reduction randomised controlled trial for people experiencing cognitive decline: the Body, Brain, Life for Cognitive Decline (BBL-CD). Aging & Mental Health. 27(11). 2111–2119. 2 indexed citations
2.
Gulliver, Amelia, et al.. (2021). The Music Engagement Program for people with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: Pilot feasibility trial outcomes. Evaluation and Program Planning. 87. 101930–101930. 9 indexed citations
3.
Anstey, Kaarin J., Nicolas Cherbuin, Sarang Kim, et al.. (2020). An Internet-Based Intervention Augmented With a Diet and Physical Activity Consultation to Decrease the Risk of Dementia in At-Risk Adults in a Primary Care Setting: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(9). e19431–e19431. 28 indexed citations
4.
McMaster, Mitchell, Sarang Kim, Linda Clare, et al.. (2020). Lifestyle Risk Factors and Cognitive Outcomes from the Multidomain Dementia Risk Reduction Randomized Controlled Trial, Body Brain Life for Cognitive Decline ( BBL‐CD ). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 68(11). 2629–2637. 43 indexed citations
5.
Gulliver, Amelia, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of the Music Engagement Program for people with Alzheimer's disease and dementia: Study protocol for a pilot trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 15. 100419–100419. 8 indexed citations
6.
MacAndrew, Margaret, Ann Kolanowski, Elaine Fielding, et al.. (2019). “Would you like to join me for a walk?” The feasibility of a supervised walking programme for people with dementia who wander. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 14(3). e12244–e12244. 4 indexed citations
8.
McMaster, Mitchell, Sarang Kim, Linda Clare, et al.. (2018). Body, Brain, Life for Cognitive Decline (BBL-CD): protocol for a multidomain dementia risk reduction randomized controlled trial for subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Clinical Interventions in Aging. Volume 13. 2397–2406. 26 indexed citations
9.
Beattie, Elizabeth, Maria OʼReilly, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, et al.. (2018). Supporting autonomy of nursing home residents with dementia in the informed consent process. Dementia. 18(7-8). 2821–2835. 16 indexed citations
10.
McMaster, Mitchell, Elaine Fielding, David Lim, Wendy Moyle, & Elizabeth Beattie. (2017). A cross-sectional examination of the prevalence of psychotropic medications for people living with dementia in Australian long-term care facilities: issues of concern. International Psychogeriatrics. 30(7). 1019–1026. 24 indexed citations
11.
Travers, Catherine, Deborah Brooks, Sonia Hines, et al.. (2016). Effectiveness of meaningful occupation interventions for people living with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 14(12). 163–225. 63 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, James, Mitchell McMaster, & Andry Rakotonirainy. (2015). An Exploration into Younger and Older Pedestrians’ Risky Behaviours at Train Level Crossings. Safety. 1(1). 16–27. 5 indexed citations
13.
Fielding, Elaine, et al.. (2015). Achieving a National Sample of Nursing Homes: Balancing Probability Techniques and Practicalities. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 9(2). 58–65. 8 indexed citations
14.
Watson, Angela, et al.. (2014). Outcome evaluation framework for the Queensland Alcohol Ignition Interlock Program. Report to Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR 3814). QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, James, et al.. (2013). Understanding pedestrian behaviour at railway level crossings: is there a need for more research?. Road and transport research. 22(3). 72–82. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026