Mirko D’Ovidio
- Modeling and Simulation top 2%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Enzo OrsingherPaola LoretiErkan NaneRoberto GarraLuisa BeghinSilvia VitaliGastone CastellaniOleksii Sliusarenko
- Topics
- Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (23 papers)Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (17 papers)Stochastic processes and financial applications (11 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Mathematical Analysis and ApplicationsPhysica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
In The Last Decade
Mirko D’Ovidio
33 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Modeling and Simulation 186
- Applied Mathematics 137
- Mathematical Physics 66
- Numerical Analysis 55
- Finance 54
Countries citing papers authored by Mirko D’Ovidio
This map shows the geographic impact of Mirko D’Ovidio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mirko D’Ovidio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mirko D’Ovidio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mirko D’Ovidio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mirko D’Ovidio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mirko D’Ovidio. The network helps show where Mirko D’Ovidio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mirko D’Ovidio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mirko D’Ovidio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mirko D’Ovidio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mirko D’Ovidio. Mirko D’Ovidio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Mirko D’Ovidio
Mirko D’Ovidio is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Applied Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 35 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (23 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (17 papers) and Stochastic processes and financial applications (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (186 citations), Applied Mathematics (137 citations) and Numerical Analysis (55 citations). Mirko D’Ovidio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Ukraine and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Enzo Orsingher, Paola Loreti, Erkan Nane, Roberto Garra, Luisa Beghin, Silvia Vitali, Gastone Castellani, Oleksii Sliusarenko, Nikolai Leonenko and Paolo Paradisi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications and Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.