Ming Wei
About
In The Last Decade
Ming Wei
4 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Infectious Diseases 80
- Neurology 45
- Language and Linguistics 38
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Ming Wei
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Wei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Wei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Wei. The network helps show where Ming Wei may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming Wei
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming Wei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming Wei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming Wei. Ming Wei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | The Interrelatedness of Affective Factors in EFL Learning: An Examination of Motivational Patterns in Relation to Anxiety in China. | 46 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.