Korean journal of anesthesiology

2.0k papers and 22.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology in the last decades have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (822 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (445 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (524 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (505 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (318 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean journal of anesthesiology are Jonghae Kim, Hyun Kang, Tae Kyun Kim, Dong Kyu Lee, Francis Sahngun Nahm, Sangseok Lee, Sang Gyu Kwak, Junyong In, Hyun Sik Chung and Eun Jin Ahn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology.

Countries where authors publish in Korean journal of anesthesiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean journal of anesthesiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean journal of anesthesiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean journal of anesthesiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025