Luke Demaitre
- History top 2%
- Archeology top 10%
- Classics top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard C. DalesKarl SüdhoffCharles Singer
- Topics
- History of Medicine Studies (18 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers)History of Science and Medicine (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewIsis
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Luke Demaitre
20 papers receiving 123 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- History 78
- Archeology 33
- Classics 22
- Infectious Diseases 20
- Philosophy 19
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Demaitre
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Demaitre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Demaitre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Demaitre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Demaitre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Demaitre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Demaitre. The network helps show where Luke Demaitre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Demaitre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Demaitre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Demaitre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Demaitre. Luke Demaitre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Luis Garcia-Ballester. Galen and Galenism: Theory and Medical Practice from Antiquity to the European Renaissance. Edited by Jon Arrizabalaga, Monserrat Cabre, Lluis Cifuentes, and Fernando Salmon | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 02.10.14, Daston and Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150-1750 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | The Fasciculus medicinae of Johannes de Ketham, Alemanus : facsimile of the first (Venetian) edition of 1491 with English translation | 4 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | The description and diagnosis of leprosy by fourteenth-century physicians. | 9 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | The idea of childhood and child care in medical writings of the Middle Ages. | 16 |
| 19 | Nature and the Art of Medicine in the Later Middle Ages | 1 |
| 20 | 7 |
About Luke Demaitre
Luke Demaitre is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science and Classics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Medicine Studies (18 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (78 citations), Classics (22 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations). Luke Demaitre has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Dales, Karl Südhoff and Charles Singer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Isis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.