Mike Tucker

4.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
22 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Mike Tucker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mike Tucker has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Social Psychology, 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mike Tucker's work include Motor Control and Adaptation (15 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (15 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Mike Tucker is often cited by papers focused on Motor Control and Adaptation (15 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (15 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). Mike Tucker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Mike Tucker's co-authors include Rob Ellis, Rebecca Ellis, Ed Symes, Lari Vainio, Julie Grèzes, R.E. Passingham, Jorge L. Armony, Giovanni Ottoboni, Judy Edworthy and Elizabeth Hellier and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Experimental Brain Research and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Mike Tucker

22 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

On the relations between seen objects and components of p... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 1998 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mike Tucker United Kingdom 17 2.5k 2.5k 982 679 106 22 3.3k
Rob Ellis United Kingdom 22 2.0k 0.8× 1.9k 0.8× 795 0.8× 551 0.8× 82 0.8× 39 2.7k
Jochen Müsseler Germany 28 3.6k 1.4× 2.8k 1.1× 972 1.0× 1.1k 1.6× 176 1.7× 100 4.6k
Catherine L. Reed United States 27 2.7k 1.1× 1.1k 0.4× 475 0.5× 1.2k 1.8× 290 2.7× 82 3.4k
Sabine Hunnius Netherlands 32 1.6k 0.6× 1.5k 0.6× 1.6k 1.6× 505 0.7× 93 0.9× 116 2.9k
Wilfried Kunde Germany 43 5.4k 2.1× 3.0k 1.2× 1.5k 1.5× 1.1k 1.6× 183 1.7× 281 6.5k
Matthias Weigelt Germany 25 1.3k 0.5× 929 0.4× 960 1.0× 230 0.3× 81 0.8× 120 2.1k
Peter Bullemer United States 15 2.7k 1.1× 992 0.4× 1.3k 1.3× 472 0.7× 29 0.3× 32 3.7k
Marco Steinhauser Germany 27 2.9k 1.1× 695 0.3× 382 0.4× 916 1.3× 40 0.4× 97 3.7k
Yves Paulignan France 28 3.3k 1.3× 2.0k 0.8× 977 1.0× 655 1.0× 79 0.7× 44 4.0k
Anthony P. Atkinson United Kingdom 23 2.3k 0.9× 990 0.4× 387 0.4× 1.1k 1.7× 78 0.7× 43 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Tucker. The network helps show where Mike Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Tucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Tucker. Mike Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bach, Patric, et al.. (2014). Planning-related motor processes underlie mental practice and imitation learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 143(3). 1277–1294. 14 indexed citations
2.
Hellier, Elizabeth, et al.. (2013). Evaluating the application of research-based guidance to the design of an emergency preparedness leaflet. Applied Ergonomics. 45(5). 1320–1329. 5 indexed citations
3.
Ellis, Rob, et al.. (2011). Bodies and other visual objects: the dialectics of reaching toward objects. Psychological Research. 77(1). 31–39. 26 indexed citations
4.
5.
Symes, Ed, Giovanni Ottoboni, Mike Tucker, Rob Ellis, & Alessia Tessari. (2009). When Motor Attention Improves Selective Attention: The Dissociating Role of Saliency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63(7). 1387–1397. 14 indexed citations
6.
Symes, Ed, Mike Tucker, Rob Ellis, Lari Vainio, & Giovanni Ottoboni. (2008). Grasp preparation improves change detection for congruent objects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 34(4). 854–871. 68 indexed citations
7.
Vainio, Lari, Ed Symes, Rob Ellis, Mike Tucker, & Giovanni Ottoboni. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition. 108(2). 444–465. 75 indexed citations
8.
Ellis, Rob, Mike Tucker, Ed Symes, & Lari Vainio. (2007). Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 33(3). 670–691. 49 indexed citations
9.
Vainio, Lari, Mike Tucker, & Rob Ellis. (2007). Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping. Brain and Cognition. 65(2). 195–207. 22 indexed citations
10.
Vainio, Lari, Rob Ellis, Mike Tucker, & Ed Symes. (2006). Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping. Experimental Brain Research. 173(3). 395–406. 17 indexed citations
11.
Vainio, Lari, Rob Ellis, Mike Tucker, & Ed Symes. (2006). Local and global affordances and manual planning. Experimental Brain Research. 179(4). 583–594. 4 indexed citations
12.
Symes, Ed, Rob Ellis, & Mike Tucker. (2006). Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica. 124(2). 238–255. 89 indexed citations
13.
Vainio, Lari, Rob Ellis, & Mike Tucker. (2006). The role of visual attention in action priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 60(2). 241–261. 58 indexed citations
14.
Ellis, Rob, et al.. (2005). The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory. Acta Psychologica. 122(1). 74–98. 65 indexed citations
15.
Tucker, Mike & Rob Ellis. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica. 116(2). 185–203. 333 indexed citations
16.
Grèzes, Julie, Mike Tucker, Jorge L. Armony, Rebecca Ellis, & R.E. Passingham. (2003). Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience. 17(12). 2735–2740. 281 indexed citations
17.
Tucker, Mike & Rob Ellis. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition. 8(6). 769–800. 377 indexed citations
18.
Ellis, Rob & Mike Tucker. (2000). Micro‐affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology. 91(4). 451–471. 338 indexed citations
19.
Tucker, Mike & Rebecca Ellis. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 24(3). 830–846. 726 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Tucker, Mike & Rob Ellis. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 24(3). 830–846. 632 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026