Mika Suga

27 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Mika Suga
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Biophysics 35
  • Developmental Neuroscience 19
  • Molecular Biology 239
  • Biomedical Engineering 106
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 33
Replace Daniel Simão with:
Daniel Simão Portugal
Gloria Kwon United States
Szczepan W. Baran United States
Abhishek Saini India
Gabriel Neiman Argentina
Martha Grabos Germany
Stephanie Brown United Kingdom
Jennifer Hyoje-Ryu Kenty United States
Zhenrong Yang China
Sarthak Sahoo India
Mika Suga relative to Daniel Simão Portugal Daniel Simão's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Daniel Simão · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mika Suga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mika Suga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mika Suga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mika Suga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mika Suga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mika Suga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mika Suga. The network helps show where Mika Suga may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mika Suga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mika Suga Line = papers co-authored together Mika Suga links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201357
2 201654
3 201626
4 201626
5 201522
6 201922
7 201421
8 201619
9 201818
10 20219
11 20159
12 20179
13 20169
14 20165
15 20225
16 20214
17 20184
18 20194
19 20244
20 20203

About Mika Suga

Mika Suga is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 28 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (18 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (35 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (19 citations), Molecular Biology (239 citations), Biomedical Engineering (106 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (33 citations). Mika Suga has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miho Furue, Masaki Kinehara, Kana Yanagihara, Haruhisa Inoue, Hiroki Nikawa, Takayuki Kondo, Kozue Uchio‐Yamada, Yasujiro Kiyota, Daiki Tateyama and Takayuki Fukuda. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, The International Journal of Developmental Biology, Stem Cells Translational Medicine and Stem Cells and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact