Mieke Boon

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mieke Boon
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • History and Philosophy of Science 133
  • Health Informatics 34
  • Water Science and Technology 362
  • Information Systems and Management 163
  • Environmental Chemistry 176
Replace John W. Renner with:
John W. Renner United States
Phillip Johnson United States
Zeyuan Liu China
Jian Qin United States
Tao He China
National Research Council
Donald D. Carpenter United States
Behnam Taebi Netherlands
Taehyun Ha South Korea
Richard Worthington United States
Mieke Boon relative to John W. Renner United States John W. Renner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.4×
John W. Renner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mieke Boon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mieke Boon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mieke Boon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mieke Boon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mieke Boon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mieke Boon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mieke Boon. The network helps show where Mieke Boon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mieke Boon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mieke Boon Line = papers co-authored together Mieke Boon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020198
2 201880
3 199869
4 201160
5 201158
6 199854
7 199951
8 202143
9 199843
10 199835
11 201435
12
Theoretical and experimental methods in the modelling of bio-oxidation kinetics of sulphide minerals
199633
13 200632
14 200132
15 202229
16 199928
17 199827
18 199925
19
Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences: A Pragmatic Approach.
200921
20 199821

About Mieke Boon

Mieke Boon is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Management, Water Science and Technology and Molecular Biology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (11 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (10 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (10 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (6 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (5 papers), Cognitive Science and Education Research (5 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (133 citations), Health Informatics (34 citations), Water Science and Technology (362 citations), Information Systems and Management (163 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (176 citations). Mieke Boon has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Heijnen, Sophie van Baalen, G.S. Hansford, Tarja Knuuttila, Jan van der Veen, Miles MacLeod, Anne L. van de Ven, R.G. Klaassen, Antoine van den Beemt and Cor Ras. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrometallurgy, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact