Michelle McCarthy

76 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michelle McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Safety Research 762
  • Clinical Psychology 565
  • Demography 272
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 32
  • Health 153
Replace Ellie McCoy with:
Ellie McCoy United Kingdom
Maria Aparecida Crepaldi Brazil
Eileen Baldry Australia
H. Virginia McCoy United States
Leyla Ismayilova United States
Carol E. Kaufman United States
Tazeen Saeed Ali Pakistan
Kim J. Nickerson United States
Chaohua Lou China
Stephen Metraux United States
Michelle McCarthy relative to Ellie McCoy United Kingdom Ellie McCoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ellie McCoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle McCarthy. The network helps show where Michelle McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Michelle McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sexuality and women with learning disabilities
1999167
2 1997109
3 200873
4 199658
5 200154
6 200953
7 199852
8 201445
9
Good Times, Bad Times: Women with Learning Difficulties Telling their Stories
200045
10 200944
11 201244
12 199739
13 199838
14 202135
15 199733
16 199633
17 201632
18 201431
19 199630
20 201030

About Michelle McCarthy

Michelle McCarthy is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Demography, General Health Professions and Education, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (32 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (15 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (762 citations), Clinical Psychology (565 citations), Demography (272 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (32 citations) and Health (153 citations). Michelle McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David R. Thompson, Catherine McMahon, Paul Cambridge, David Thompson, Robert J. Harrington, Rachel Forrester‐Jones, Nick Gore, Stephen P. Pereira, David R. Thompson and Rachel Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Sexuality and Disability, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability and The Journal of Adult Protection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact