Michelle Gray

449 total citations
46 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

Michelle Gray is a scholar working on Education, Obstetrics and Gynecology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Gray has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Education, 12 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 11 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Michelle Gray's work include Global Health Workforce Issues (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers) and Nursing education and management (8 papers). Michelle Gray is often cited by papers focused on Global Health Workforce Issues (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers) and Nursing education and management (8 papers). Michelle Gray collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Michelle Gray's co-authors include Terri Downer, Margaret Barnes, Jennifer Rowe, Tanya Capper, Angela Bromley, Jing‐Yu Tan, Isabella Garti, Margaret McAllister, Patrea Andersen and Leonie Mosel Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Gray

40 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Gray Australia 11 80 68 66 54 54 46 290
Champion N. Nyoni South Africa 10 9 0.1× 61 0.9× 76 1.2× 112 2.1× 46 0.9× 50 230
Nadine van der Lee Netherlands 9 22 0.3× 27 0.4× 166 2.5× 203 3.8× 27 0.5× 10 350
Isabelle Campos de Azevedo Brazil 8 7 0.1× 78 1.1× 67 1.0× 69 1.3× 9 0.2× 69 270
Josephine Nambi Najjuma Uganda 11 11 0.1× 9 0.1× 66 1.0× 71 1.3× 20 0.4× 47 254
Silvana Silveira Kempfer Brazil 10 6 0.1× 112 1.6× 127 1.9× 91 1.7× 28 0.5× 62 326
Sudharsanam Manni Balasubramaniam United States 9 74 0.9× 22 0.3× 62 0.9× 97 1.8× 12 0.2× 16 331
Kyrah K. Brown United States 9 35 0.4× 61 0.9× 95 1.4× 44 0.8× 13 0.2× 47 292
Kay Mohanna United Kingdom 7 17 0.2× 44 0.6× 56 0.8× 98 1.8× 11 0.2× 25 173
Margaret L. McKenzie United States 10 12 0.1× 40 0.6× 71 1.1× 144 2.7× 11 0.2× 26 296
Abigail Wolf United States 9 33 0.4× 33 0.5× 97 1.5× 163 3.0× 15 0.3× 20 331

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Gray. The network helps show where Michelle Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Gray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Gray. Michelle Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stulz, Virginia, Allison Cummins, Deborah Davis, et al.. (2025). Midwives’ perceptions of the support they provide to new graduates and the role of the health service in Australia: A survey of midwives. Women and Birth. 38(3). 101913–101913.
3.
Gray, Michelle, et al.. (2024). The lived experience of midwives’ transitioning from a clinical role into teaching in higher education in one jurisdiction of Australia: A pilot study. Nurse Education in Practice. 79. 104071–104071. 1 indexed citations
4.
Garti, Isabella, Michelle Gray, Angela Bromley, & Jing‐Yu Tan. (2024). Pre-eclampsia training needs of midwives in a Ghanaian tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice. 75. 103872–103872.
6.
Garti, Isabella, Michelle Gray, Angela Bromley, & Jing‐Yu Tan. (2023). A socioecological description of the influencing factors to midwives’ management of preeclampsia in a Ghanaian tertiary hospital. PLoS ONE. 18(9). e0291036–e0291036. 6 indexed citations
7.
Gray, Michelle, et al.. (2023). Models of clinical supervision of relevance to remote area nursing & primary health care: A scoping review. Australian Journal of Rural Health. 31(5). 826–838. 2 indexed citations
8.
Gray, Michelle, et al.. (2022). What do we know about midwives’ transition from clinical practice to higher education teaching roles? A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice. 67. 103531–103531. 5 indexed citations
9.
Carter, Amanda, Amanda Müller, Michelle Gray, et al.. (2022). Critical thinking development in undergraduate midwifery students: an Australian validation study using Rasch analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22(1). 972–972. 3 indexed citations
10.
Kearney, Lauren, et al.. (2022). New graduate midwives’ transition to practice: A scoping review. Midwifery. 111. 103337–103337. 11 indexed citations
11.
Brewer, Naomi, Sunia Foliaki, Michelle Gray, John D. Potter, & Jeroen Douwes. (2022). Pasifika women's knowledge and perceptions of cervical-cancer screening and the implementation of self-testing in Aotearoa New Zealand: A qualitative study. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific. 28. 100551–100551. 6 indexed citations
12.
Garti, Isabella, Michelle Gray, Angela Bromley, & Jing‐Yu Tan. (2022). A qualitative document analysis of policies influencing preeclampsia management by midwives in Ghana. Women and Birth. 35(6). 612–618. 7 indexed citations
13.
Downer, Terri, Michelle Gray, & Tanya Capper. (2021). Online learning and teaching approaches used in midwifery programs: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today. 103. 104980–104980. 17 indexed citations
14.
Gray, Michelle, et al.. (2020). An Unthinkable Loss. 1(1). 3 indexed citations
15.
Gray, Michelle, Terri Downer, & Tanya Capper. (2020). Midwifery student's perceptions of completing a portfolio of evidence for initial registration: A qualitative exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice. 43. 102696–102696. 1 indexed citations
16.
Gray, Michelle, Terri Downer, & Tanya Capper. (2019). Australian midwifery student's perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with completing a portfolio of evidence for initial registration: Paper based and ePortfolios. Nurse Education in Practice. 39. 37–44. 16 indexed citations
17.
Gray, Michelle. (2018). Research into midwifery mentorship: The challenge of exploring reluctant mentors' perspective of their role. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast). 26(1). 35. 2 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Michelle. (2018). Midwifery mentorship; What do we know about the mentors' perspective of the role?. 18(1). 50. 3 indexed citations
19.
Gray, Michelle, Jennifer Rowe, & Margaret Barnes. (2013). Continuing professional development and changed re-registration requirements: Midwives' reflections. Nurse Education Today. 34(5). 860–865. 11 indexed citations
20.
McAllister, Margaret, et al.. (2009). In My Day: Using lessons from history, ritual and our elders to build professional identity. Nurse Education in Practice. 9(4). 277–283. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026