Michał Lew‐Starowicz
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rafał RolaMateusz GolaShane W. KrausEwelina KowalewskaMarc N. PotenzaKarol LewczukRyszard GellertArtur Marchewka
- Topics
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (24 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (15 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Michał Lew‐Starowicz
52 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Clinical Psychology 665
- Gender Studies 367
- Psychiatry and Mental health 334
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- Social Psychology 202
Countries citing papers authored by Michał Lew‐Starowicz
This map shows the geographic impact of Michał Lew‐Starowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michał Lew‐Starowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michał Lew‐Starowicz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michał Lew‐Starowicz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michał Lew‐Starowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michał Lew‐Starowicz. The network helps show where Michał Lew‐Starowicz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michał Lew‐Starowicz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michał Lew‐Starowicz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michał Lew‐Starowicz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michał Lew‐Starowicz. Michał Lew‐Starowicz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 83 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Sexuality of Polish women Report „Sexuality of Polish people 2002” | 2 |
About Michał Lew‐Starowicz
Michał Lew‐Starowicz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Gender Studies, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (24 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (15 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (367 citations), Clinical Psychology (665 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (334 citations). Michał Lew‐Starowicz has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rafał Rola, Mateusz Gola, Shane W. Kraus, Ewelina Kowalewska, Marc N. Potenza, Karol Lewczuk, Ryszard Gellert, Artur Marchewka, Woet L. Gianotten and Guillaume Sescousse. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, Behavioural Brain Research and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.