Erika Limoncin
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Emmanuele A. JanniniGiacomo CioccaDaniele MollaioliAndrea SansoneElena ColonnelloAndrea LenziGiovanni Luca GravinaStefania Di Sante
- Topics
- Sexual function and dysfunction studies (49 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (47 papers)LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEThe Journal of Urology
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Erika Limoncin
87 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Clinical Psychology 909
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 375
- Sociology and Political Science 310
- Social Psychology 294
Countries citing papers authored by Erika Limoncin
This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Limoncin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Limoncin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Limoncin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Limoncin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Limoncin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Limoncin. The network helps show where Erika Limoncin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika Limoncin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika Limoncin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika Limoncin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erika Limoncin. Erika Limoncin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 70 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 112 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Erika Limoncin
Erika Limoncin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Urology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual function and dysfunction studies (49 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (47 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (909 citations) and Urology (169 citations). Erika Limoncin has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuele A. Jannini, Giacomo Ciocca, Daniele Mollaioli, Andrea Sansone, Elena Colonnello, Andrea Lenzi, Giovanni Luca Gravina, Stefania Di Sante, Eleonora Carosa and Mario Maggi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.