Michael von Rad

16 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Michael von Rad
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Clinical Psychology 247
  • Sociology and Political Science 98
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
  • Neurology 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
Replace Mina Mazaheri with:
Mina Mazaheri Iran
Stefan Kempke Belgium
Bálint Andó Hungary
Amy Robinson Canada
María Ángeles García‐León Spain
Joel D. Haber United States
Ellen Haller United States
Ejder Akgün Yıldırım Türkiye
Jens Søndergaard Jensen Denmark
Yekeen A. Aderibigbe United States
Michael von Rad relative to Mina Mazaheri Iran Mina Mazaheri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Mina Mazaheri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael von Rad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael von Rad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael von Rad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael von Rad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael von Rad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael von Rad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael von Rad. The network helps show where Michael von Rad may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael von Rad

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael von Rad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael von Rad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael von Rad. Michael von Rad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 86
2 0
3
Bettenbedarf für die vollstationäre Versorgung von Patienten mit psychosomatischen Erkrankungen in Bayern
0
4 7
5 15
6 0
7
Unterwegs zum Wirksamkeitsnachweis von Psychoanalysen und Psychotherapien – Sisyphos zwischen therapeutischer Scylla und methodischer Charybdis. Ein Kommentar aus der Sicht der empirischen Psychotherapieforschung
7
8 91
9 110
10 113
11 5
12 12
13 7
14
[Current problems of psychoanalytic psychosomatics].
1
15 16
16 12
17 6
18 2
19
[Alexithymia and social class].
1
20
Anthropologie als Thema von psychosomatischer Medizin und Theologie
0

About Michael von Rad

Michael von Rad is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (66 citations), Clinical Psychology (247 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (51 citations). Michael von Rad has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Deckardt, Manfred E. Beutel, Herbert Weiner, Peter Herschbach, Gerhard Henrich, Andrés Ceballos-Baumann, Harald Gündel, Raymonde Busch, Karl‐Heinz Ladwig and Frank Jacobi. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026