Michael Vita
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Marketing top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Co-authors
- James CooperLuke M. FroebPaul A. PautlerJoseph FarrellD. O’BrienDeborah Haas‐WilsonOrley AshenfelterLaurence Schumann
- Topics
- Merger and Competition Analysis (15 papers)Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Vita
23 papers receiving 489 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Economics and Econometrics 501
- Marketing 166
- General Health Professions 155
- Strategy and Management 102
- Accounting 63
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Vita
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Vita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Vita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Vita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Vita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Vita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Vita. The network helps show where Michael Vita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Vita
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Vita. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Vita based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Vita. Michael Vita is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | MERGER EFFICIENCIES: RECONSIDERING THE "PASSING-ON" REQUIREMENT | 3 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | COMMENT: IS THERE NEW THINKING ON VERTICAL MERGERS? | 0 |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | Vertical Restrictions and Antitrust Policy: What About the Evidence? | 2 |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 76 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Economic analysis in health care antitrust. | 9 |
| 19 | 146 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Michael Vita
Michael Vita is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Marketing and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 25 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (15 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (166 citations), Economics and Econometrics (501 citations) and Strategy and Management (102 citations). Michael Vita has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Cooper, Luke M. Froeb, Paul A. Pautler, Joseph Farrell, D. O’Brien, Deborah Haas‐Wilson, Orley Ashenfelter, Laurence Schumann, Daniel Hosken and Matthew Weinberg. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Energy, Journal of Health Economics and Journal of Industrial Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.