Michael Vita
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing 7
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Merger and Competition Analysis 15
- Healthcare Policy and Management 6
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Digital Platforms and Economics 5
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Global Health Care Issues 3
-
- Global trade and economics 4
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 3
-
- ICT Impact and Policies 3
- Co-authors
- James CooperLuke M. FroebPaul A. PautlerJoseph FarrellD. O’BrienDeborah Haas‐WilsonOrley AshenfelterLaurence Schumann
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Vita
23 papers receiving 489 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Marketing 166
- Economics and Econometrics 501
- Strategy and Management 102
- General Health Professions 155
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 49
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Vita
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Vita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Vita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Vita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Vita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Vita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Vita. The network helps show where Michael Vita may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michael Vita, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | MERGER EFFICIENCIES: RECONSIDERING THE "PASSING-ON" REQUIREMENT | 2016 | 3 |
| 4 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 5 | COMMENT: IS THERE NEW THINKING ON VERTICAL MERGERS? | 2016 | 0 |
| 6 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 9 | Vertical Restrictions and Antitrust Policy: What About the Evidence? | 2005 | 2 |
| 10 | 2005 | 68 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 76 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 18 | Economic analysis in health care antitrust. | 1991 | 9 |
| 19 | 1990 | 146 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 1 |
About Michael Vita
Michael Vita is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Marketing and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 25 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (15 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and ICT Impact and Policies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (166 citations), Economics and Econometrics (501 citations) and Strategy and Management (102 citations). Michael Vita has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Cooper, Luke M. Froeb, Paul A. Pautler, Joseph Farrell, D. O’Brien, Deborah Haas‐Wilson, Orley Ashenfelter, Laurence Schumann, Daniel Hosken and Matthew Weinberg.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.