Daniel Hosken

35 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Daniel Hosken
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Marketing 610
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 54
  • Economics and Econometrics 879
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 169
  • Strategy and Management 227
Replace Michael D. Noel with:
Michael D. Noel United States
David Reiffen United States
Richard Friberg Sweden
Paul L.E. Grieco United States
Jean‐François Houde United States
Emek Basker United States
J. Douglas Zona United States
Andrew Sweeting United States
Ambarish Chandra Canada
Valerie Y. Suslow United States
Daniel Hosken relative to Michael D. Noel United States Michael D. Noel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Michael D. Noel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hosken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hosken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hosken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hosken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hosken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hosken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hosken. The network helps show where Daniel Hosken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hosken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hosken Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hosken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008103
2 200496
3 201095
4 201579
5 201371
6 200755
7 201454
8 201340
9 200438
10 201135
11 201733
12 200130
13 200626
14 201522
15 200822
16 200422
17
Using Mergers to Test a Model of Oligopoly
200817
18 201217
19 200117
20 201117

About Daniel Hosken

Daniel Hosken is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management, Accounting and Pharmacology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (29 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (27 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (9 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (610 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (54 citations), Economics and Econometrics (879 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (169 citations) and Strategy and Management (227 citations). Daniel Hosken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Orley Ashenfelter, Matthew Weinberg, Christopher Taylor, David Reiffen, R. S. McMillan, J. Simpson, David Ashmore, Jonathan B. Baker, Suzanne Gleason and Brett Wendling. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law and Economics, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Journal of Industrial Economics, The RAND Journal of Economics and Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact