Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Tania LombrozoRichard J. SamuelsJennifer K. HellmannGrace CampbellTeresa Hagan ThomasMichael T. StuartJennifer H. LinglerKenneth A. Richman
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
27 papers receiving 390 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cognitive Neuroscience 133
- Philosophy 133
- History and Philosophy of Science 126
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 82
- Artificial Intelligence 78
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Wilkenfeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Wilkenfeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Wilkenfeld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Wilkenfeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Wilkenfeld. The network helps show where Daniel A. Wilkenfeld may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel A. Wilkenfeld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel A. Wilkenfeld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel A. Wilkenfeld. Daniel A. Wilkenfeld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Goals Affect the Perceived Quality of Explanations. | 5 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Explaining and Understanding | 6 |
| 20 | 83 |
About Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
Daniel A. Wilkenfeld is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Decision Sciences and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), Philosophy (133 citations) and Health Informatics (16 citations). Daniel A. Wilkenfeld has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tania Lombrozo, Richard J. Samuels, Jennifer K. Hellmann, Grace Campbell, Teresa Hagan Thomas, Michael T. Stuart, Jennifer H. Lingler, Kenneth A. Richman, Ari Ne’eman and Kareem Khalifa. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Cognitive Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.