Michael Smith

438 total citations
11 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Michael Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Smith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Speech and Hearing and 3 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Michael Smith's work include Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers). Michael Smith is often cited by papers focused on Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers). Michael Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Michael Smith's co-authors include Brian W. Chong, Orrin Devinsky, John T. Davis, William W. Orrison, Richard Andrews, Michael P. Weisend, Sherri Provencal, Jeffrey D. Lewine, Andrés M. Kanner and Michael Chez and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Otolaryngology and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

In The Last Decade

Michael Smith

11 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Smith United Kingdom 7 223 96 94 47 38 11 321
Jeanne Guiraud United Kingdom 10 343 1.5× 41 0.4× 60 0.6× 30 0.6× 14 0.4× 10 375
Fleming Salvador Pedroso Brazil 10 171 0.8× 42 0.4× 44 0.5× 17 0.4× 12 0.3× 23 302
Arnaud Coëz France 7 424 1.9× 68 0.7× 45 0.5× 26 0.6× 8 0.2× 14 475
Elina Isotalo Finland 10 138 0.6× 33 0.3× 113 1.2× 50 1.1× 13 0.3× 23 409
C. Deutsch United States 6 340 1.5× 205 2.1× 124 1.3× 12 0.3× 44 1.2× 9 505
Robin Steinberg-Epstein United States 11 203 0.9× 79 0.8× 161 1.7× 12 0.3× 45 1.2× 16 440
Maria Flora Scusa Italy 8 166 0.7× 130 1.4× 96 1.0× 6 0.1× 11 0.3× 8 343
Marién Gadea Spain 13 243 1.1× 17 0.2× 78 0.8× 6 0.1× 16 0.4× 42 464
Anna Peel United Kingdom 6 266 1.2× 136 1.4× 143 1.5× 8 0.2× 14 0.4× 6 464
Aura Frizzati United Kingdom 7 85 0.4× 39 0.4× 51 0.5× 8 0.2× 66 1.7× 8 312

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Smith. The network helps show where Michael Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Smith. Michael Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
2.
Saeed, Shakeel R., et al.. (2020). A narrative review of the logistic and economic feasibility of cochlear implants in lower-income countries. Cochlear Implants International. 22(1). 7–16. 16 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Michael, et al.. (2018). Surgical treatment of chronic ear disease in remote or resource-constrained environments. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 133(1). 49–58. 6 indexed citations
4.
Kochanski, Ryan B., et al.. (2018). Abdominal Epilepsy Treated With Vagal Nerve Stimulation: A Case Report. Operative Neurosurgery. 17(2). E73–E76. 2 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Michael, et al.. (2015). The impact of ear disease and hearing impairment on the lives of Nepali patients in Pokhara: a qualitative study. International Health. 8(2). 101–107. 8 indexed citations
6.
Robinson, Tim, et al.. (2014). Noise-induced hearing loss in small-scale metal industry in Nepal. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 128(10). 871–880. 22 indexed citations
7.
Robinson, Tim, et al.. (2014). Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among woodworkers in Nepal: a pilot study. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 21(1). 14–22. 32 indexed citations
8.
Michael, Philip C., et al.. (2010). Noise exposure and convertible cars. Otolaryngology. 143(2). 219–222. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lewine, Jeffrey D., Richard Andrews, Michael Chez, et al.. (1999). Magnetoencephalographic Patterns of Epileptiform Activity in Children With Regressive Autism Spectrum Disorders. PEDIATRICS. 104(3). 405–418. 203 indexed citations
10.
Grote, Christopher L., Serge Pierre‐Louis, Michael Smith, Richard J. Roberts, & Nils R. Varney. (1995). Significance of unilateral ear extinction on the dichotic listening test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 17(1). 1–8. 21 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Michael, et al.. (1990). Postauricular cerebellar encephalocoele secondary to chronic suppurative otitis media and mastoid surgery. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 104(12). 982–985. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026