Countries where authors publish in Operative Neurosurgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Operative Neurosurgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Operative Neurosurgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Operative Neurosurgery more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Operative Neurosurgery
This network shows the impact of papers published in Operative Neurosurgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Operative Neurosurgery.
About Operative Neurosurgery
The 3.4k papers published in Operative Neurosurgery in the last decades have received a total of 50.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Operative Neurosurgery usually cover Neurology (1.7k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (667 papers) and Surgery (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Meningioma and schwannoma management (962 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (776 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (599 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (539 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (528 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (433 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (401 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (304 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Operative Neurosurgery are Robert F. Spetzler, Albert L. Rhoton, Paul A. Gardner, Carl H. Snyderman, Amin Kassam, Michael Y. Wang, Ricardo L. Carrau, Michael T. Lawton, Theodore H. Schwartz and Daniel M. Prevedello.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.