Michael Schwartze

3.1k citations
68 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Schwartze

60 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Michael Schwartze
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 551
  • Sensory Systems 150
  • Music 86
  • Neurology 203
Replace Michael J. Martinez with:
Michael J. Martinez United States
Jeffery A. Jones Canada
Takako Fujioka United States
Manon Grube United Kingdom
Chara Malapani United States
Thomas Ethofer Germany
Sundeep Teki United Kingdom
Ingo Hertrich Germany
Viviane Pouthas France
Psyche Loui United States
Michael Schwartze relative to Michael J. Martinez United States Michael J. Martinez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Michael J. Martinez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schwartze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schwartze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schwartze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schwartze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schwartze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schwartze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schwartze. The network helps show where Michael Schwartze may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schwartze, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Schwartze Line = papers co-authored together Michael Schwartze links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010296
2 2009215
3 2010115
4 2011112
5 2015110
6 201397
7 201194
8 201783
9 201164
10 201158
11 201656
12 201453
13 201252
14 202244
15 201043
16 201638
17 201535
18 201933
19 201027
20 201625

About Michael Schwartze

Michael Schwartze is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Neurology and Sensory Systems, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (40 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (11 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (551 citations), Sensory Systems (150 citations), Music (86 citations) and Neurology (203 citations). Michael Schwartze has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sonja A. Kotz, Maren Schmidt‐Kassow, Kathrin Rothermich, Peter E. Keller, Nicolas Farrugia, Aniruddh P. Patel, Ana P. Pinheiro, Anika Stockert, Simone Dalla Bella and Christian Obermeier. Their work appears in journals such as Cortex, Schizophrenia Bulletin, NeuroImage, Behavioural Brain Research and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact