Erich Schröger
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Signal Processing top 0.2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Andreas WidmannThomas JacobsenIstván WinklerChristian M. WolffMari TervaniemiStefan BertiAlexandra BendixenIria SanMiguel
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Music Perception (205 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (108 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (105 papers)
In The Last Decade
Erich Schröger
280 papers receiving 16.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Cognitive Neuroscience 15.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 6.7k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Signal Processing 1.5k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Erich Schröger
This map shows the geographic impact of Erich Schröger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erich Schröger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erich Schröger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erich Schröger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erich Schröger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erich Schröger. The network helps show where Erich Schröger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erich Schröger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erich Schröger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erich Schröger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erich Schröger. Erich Schröger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | Audiovisual facilitation is maintained under degraded visual stimulation during the perception of dynamic emotion expressions | 3 |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 189 | |
| 19 | 308 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Music, having authored 288 papers that have together received 16.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (205 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (108 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (105 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (15.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (6.7k citations) and Music (797 citations). Erich Schröger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Widmann, Thomas Jacobsen, István Winkler, Christian M. Wolff, Mari Tervaniemi, Stefan Berti, Alexandra Bendixen, Iria SanMiguel, Urte Roeber and Nicole Wetzel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.