Michael Ryder
Impact in
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 1
- Surgery 2
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 1
- Co-authors
- Matthew B. Garber (4 shared papers)Gail D. Deyle (3 shared papers)Nancy Henderson (2 shared papers)Stephen Allison (2 shared papers)John M. Stang (1 shared paper)Julie M. Whitman (2 shared papers)Andrew C. Bennett (2 shared papers)Timothy W. Flynn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)Spine (1 paper)Resources Policy (1 paper)Notes and Queries (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Michael Ryder
10 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Rheumatology 387
- Pharmacology 208
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 80
- Rehabilitation 45
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ryder
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ryder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ryder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ryder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ryder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ryder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ryder. The network helps show where Michael Ryder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ryder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 467 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 320 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 143 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 140 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 6 | A Comparison Between Two Physical Therapy Treatment Programs for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | 2006 | 10 |
| 7 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 0 |
About Michael Ryder
Michael Ryder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Surgery, Rheumatology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper), Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Extraction and Separation Processes (1 paper), TGF-β signaling in diseases (1 paper) and Global Energy and Sustainability Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (387 citations), Pharmacology (208 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (80 citations), Rehabilitation (45 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106 citations). Michael Ryder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Matthew B. Garber, Gail D. Deyle, Nancy Henderson, Stephen Allison, John M. Stang, Julie M. Whitman, Andrew C. Bennett, Timothy W. Flynn, Robert S. Wainner and John D. Childs. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, The Historical Journal, Spine, Resources Policy and Notes and Queries.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.