Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. O’Mahony
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. O’Mahony's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. O’Mahony with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. O’Mahony more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. O’Mahony
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. O’Mahony. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. O’Mahony. The network helps show where Michael P. O’Mahony may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael P. O’Mahony
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael P. O’Mahony.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael P. O’Mahony based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael P. O’Mahony. Michael P. O’Mahony is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jerbi, Houssem, et al.. (2017). Towards the Recommendation of Personalised Activity Sequences in the Tourism Domain. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 26–30.6 indexed citations
Dong, Ruihai, Kevin McCarthy, Michael P. O’Mahony, Markus Schaal, & Barry Smyth. (2012). Towards an intelligent reviewer's assistant. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).8 indexed citations
8.
Brabazon, Dermot, et al.. (2012). CONTENT ON DEMAND FOR FOURTH YEAR ADVANCED MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING STUDENTS. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
9.
O’Mahony, Michael P., et al.. (2011). A multi-criteria evaluation of a user generated content based recommender system. Conference on Recommender Systems.14 indexed citations
10.
McNally, Kevin, Michael P. O’Mahony, & Barry Smyth. (2011). Evaluating user reputation in collaborative web search. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).2 indexed citations
O’Mahony, Michael P. & Barry Smyth. (2010). A classification-based review recommender. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).6 indexed citations
13.
O’Mahony, Michael P. & Barry Smyth. (2010). The Readability of Helpful Product Reviews. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).1 indexed citations
14.
O’Mahony, Michael P., et al.. (2010). Towards tagging and categorization for micro-blogs. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.11 indexed citations
15.
McNally, Kevin, Michael P. O’Mahony, Barry Smyth, Maurice Coyle, & Peter Briggs. (2010). Collaboration and Reputation in Social Web Search. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
O’Mahony, Michael P., Neil Hurley, & G.C.M. Silvestre. (2005). Recommender systems: attack types and strategies. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 334–339.60 indexed citations
19.
O’Mahony, Michael P., Neil Hurley, & G.C.M. Silvestre. (2004). Efficient and secure collaborative filtering through intelligent neighbour selection. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 383–387.8 indexed citations
20.
O’Mahony, Michael P., Neil Hurley, Nicholas Kushmerick, & G.C.M. Silvestre. (2004). Collaborative recommendation. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 4(4). 344–377.228 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.