Michael Ν. Forster
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 4
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Philosophy and Historical Thought 3
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- General Social Sciences top 10%
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 4
- Translation Studies and Practices 3
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)German Studies Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael Ν. Forster
26 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Philosophy 146
- History and Philosophy of Science 38
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 45
- General Social Sciences 10
- Music 9
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ν. Forster
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ν. Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ν. Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ν. Forster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ν. Forster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ν. Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ν. Forster. The network helps show where Michael Ν. Forster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ν. Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 3 | Traduire les sciences humaines | 2021 | 2 |
| 4 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 13 | After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition | 2010 | 29 |
| 14 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 17 | Herder’s Philosophy of Language, Interpretation, and Translation: Three Fundamental Principles | 2002 | 11 |
| 18 | Johann Gottfried von Herder Philosophical Writings | 2002 | 5 |
| 19 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 19 |
About Michael Ν. Forster
Michael Ν. Forster is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Philosophy and Historical Thought (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (146 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (38 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (45 citations). Michael Ν. Forster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frederick Neuhouser, Kristin Gjesdal, Johann Gottfried Herder and Jean‐René Ladmiral. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and German Studies Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.