Michael Modell

66 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Thermodynamics and its applications 1974 · 543 citations
5431974202619912008100200300400500

Peers

Michael Modell
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Filtration and Separation 78
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 202
  • Catalysis 183
  • Family Practice 55
  • Biomedical Engineering 753
Replace Edward S. Amis with:
Edward S. Amis United States
J. Garside United Kingdom
K. Vetter Germany
Reinier Akkermans Netherlands
John W. Larsen United States
Jiguo Zhang China
Paul A. Mulheran United Kingdom
John F. Richardson United States
Masashi Goto Japan
Thomas Schmidt Germany
Michael Modell relative to Edward S. Amis United States Edward S. Amis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Edward S. Amis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Modell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Modell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Modell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Modell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Modell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Modell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Modell. The network helps show where Michael Modell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Modell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Modell Line = papers co-authored together Michael Modell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Thermodynamics and its applications
Hit paper breakdown →
1974543
2 1993151
3 1984133
4 197598
5 199471
6 199765
7 200463
8 200562
9 198060
10 199857
11 200756
12 198848
13 197046
14 197442
15 197438
16 197836
17 196836
18 200435
19 198234
20
Community-based teaching: the challenges.
199931

About Michael Modell

Michael Modell is a scholar working on Family Practice, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Catalysis, Biomedical Engineering and General Health Professions, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes (11 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (5 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (78 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (202 citations), Catalysis (183 citations), Family Practice (55 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (753 citations). Michael Modell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Jefferson W. Tester, Elizabeth Murray, Charles N. Satterfield, Robert C. Reid, Hilary Bekker, Martin Bobrow, Theresa M. Marteau, Raymond F. Baddour, Brian Jolly and Bernadette Modell. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Family Practice, Medical Education, Fluid Phase Equilibria and AIChE Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026