Fluid Phase Equilibria

11.7k papers and 276.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.7k papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria in the last decades have received a total of 276.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria usually cover Biomedical Engineering (8.1k papers), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (6.1k papers) and Organic Chemistry (4.4k papers) specifically the topics of Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (7.8k papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (6.0k papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (3.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fluid Phase Equilibria are Michael L. Michelsen, Jürgen Gmehling, João A. P. Coutinho, John M. Prausnitz, Urszula Domańska, E. Dendy Sloan, Georgios M. Kontogeorgis, Andreas Klamt, Gerd Maurer and Rafiqul Gani.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria.

Countries where authors publish in Fluid Phase Equilibria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fluid Phase Equilibria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fluid Phase Equilibria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluid Phase Equilibria more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025