Michael Metz

37 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Michael Metz
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Gastroenterology 61
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 72
  • Nephrology 57
  • Physiology 139
  • Family Practice 8
Replace Mahmoud Ali with:
Mahmoud Ali Egypt
Danielle B Freedman United Kingdom
Cornelis Biesheuvel Australia
Alireza Najafian United States
Mugdha Gokhale United States
F.T.M. Huysmans Netherlands
SJ Pocock United Kingdom
Mengdong He United States
Allison R. Jones United States
Michael Metz relative to Mahmoud Ali Egypt Mahmoud Ali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Mahmoud Ali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Metz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Metz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Metz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Metz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Metz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Metz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Metz. The network helps show where Michael Metz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Metz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Metz Line = papers co-authored together Michael Metz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200261
2 201545
3 201442
4 201741
5 200636
6 201432
7 201527
8 201518
9 200417
10
Australasian Guideline (2nd Edition): an Annex to the CLSI and UK Guidelines for the Performance of the Sweat Test for the Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis.
201716
11 201716
12 200415
13 200314
14 201613
15 201113
16 201811
17 201311
18 20199
19 20176
20 20186

About Michael Metz

Michael Metz is a scholar working on Surgery, Nephrology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (6 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers) and Insurance and Financial Risk Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (61 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (72 citations), Nephrology (57 citations), Physiology (139 citations) and Family Practice (8 citations). Michael Metz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tze Ping Loh, Enzo Ranieri, Gerald Holtmann, Peter Bytzer, A. L. Blum, Peter Baghurst, Georgia Antoniou, Alexia Peña, William M. Hague and Wendy Scheil. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Pathology, Clinical Biochemistry, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact