Amber M. Watt

1.5k total citations
20 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Amber M. Watt is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber M. Watt has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in Amber M. Watt's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers). Amber M. Watt is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers). Amber M. Watt collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Amber M. Watt's co-authors include Guy J. Maddern, Ian Faragher, Nicholas Rieger, Adam G. Elshaug, Cameron D. Willis, Linda M. Mundy, Wendy Babidge, Timothy Lathlean, David Hailey and Inger Natvig Norderhaug and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Surgery and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Amber M. Watt

20 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amber M. Watt Australia 14 386 346 275 267 109 20 1.1k
YunKyung Chang United States 18 214 0.6× 165 0.5× 203 0.7× 136 0.5× 149 1.4× 36 1.2k
Miriam E. Adams United States 7 399 1.0× 117 0.3× 204 0.7× 529 2.0× 197 1.8× 9 1.5k
Lucy Brindle United Kingdom 15 366 0.9× 152 0.4× 283 1.0× 163 0.6× 345 3.2× 32 1.2k
Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss United States 20 415 1.1× 279 0.8× 194 0.7× 247 0.9× 189 1.7× 84 1.7k
Paul Brocklehurst United Kingdom 23 579 1.5× 214 0.6× 106 0.4× 142 0.5× 207 1.9× 98 1.8k
Keith Meadows United Kingdom 21 431 1.1× 111 0.3× 155 0.6× 282 1.1× 234 2.1× 58 1.6k
Justin W. Timbie United States 20 531 1.4× 252 0.7× 437 1.6× 527 2.0× 167 1.5× 64 1.7k
Neil R. Bell Canada 23 589 1.5× 387 1.1× 302 1.1× 236 0.9× 359 3.3× 76 1.8k
Leila Rooshenas United Kingdom 16 307 0.8× 176 0.5× 86 0.3× 195 0.7× 280 2.6× 70 834
Danielle C. Lavallee United States 23 780 2.0× 356 1.0× 186 0.7× 268 1.0× 413 3.8× 84 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Amber M. Watt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber M. Watt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber M. Watt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber M. Watt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber M. Watt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber M. Watt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber M. Watt. The network helps show where Amber M. Watt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber M. Watt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber M. Watt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber M. Watt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber M. Watt. Amber M. Watt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Inacio, Maria C., Catherine Lang, Jyoti Khadka, et al.. (2020). Mortality in the first year of aged care services in Australia. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 39(4). e537–e544. 9 indexed citations
2.
Luker, Julie, Anthea Worley, Mandy Stanley, et al.. (2019). The evidence for services to avoid or delay residential aged care admission: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 19(1). 217–217. 34 indexed citations
3.
Carter, Drew, Jason Gordon, & Amber M. Watt. (2016). Competing Principles for Allocating Health Care Resources. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 41(5). 558–583. 7 indexed citations
4.
Beer, Andrew, Debbie Faulkner, Gill Lewin, et al.. (2016). Regional variation in social isolation amongst older Australians. Regional Studies Regional Science. 3(1). 170–184. 28 indexed citations
5.
Hiller, Janet E., Jackie Street, Drew Carter, et al.. (2014). Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 204–204. 29 indexed citations
6.
Carter, Drew, Amber M. Watt, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, et al.. (2013). Should There Be a Female Age Limit on Public Funding for Assisted Reproductive Technology?. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 10(1). 79–91. 12 indexed citations
7.
Watt, Amber M., Janet E. Hiller, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, et al.. (2012). The ASTUTE Health study protocol: Deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment. Implementation Science. 7(1). 101–101. 42 indexed citations
8.
Humphreys, Karen J., et al.. (2012). Systematic review of computer‐navigated total knee arthroplasty. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 83(1-2). 22–30. 34 indexed citations
9.
Elshaug, Adam G., Amber M. Watt, Linda M. Mundy, & Cameron D. Willis. (2012). Over 150 potentially low‐value health care practices: an Australian study. The Medical Journal of Australia. 197(10). 556–560. 144 indexed citations
10.
Watt, Amber M., et al.. (2012). ENGAGING CLINICIANS IN EVIDENCE-BASED DISINVESTMENT: ROLE AND PERCEPTIONS OF EVIDENCE. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 28(3). 211–219. 16 indexed citations
11.
12.
Street, Jackie, et al.. (2011). News and social media: Windows into community perspectives on disinvestment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 27(4). 376–383. 13 indexed citations
13.
Willis, Cameron D., et al.. (2011). Diagnostic performance of serum cobalamin tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathology. 43(5). 472–481. 13 indexed citations
14.
Watt, Amber M., Adam G. Elshaug, Cameron D. Willis, & Janet E. Hiller. (2011). Assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review of safety and effectiveness to inform disinvestment policy. Health Policy. 102(2-3). 200–213. 14 indexed citations
15.
Watt, Amber M., Michael Patkin, Michael Sinnott, Robert J. Black, & Guy J. Maddern. (2009). Scalpel safety in the operative setting: A systematic review. Surgery. 147(1). 98–106. 25 indexed citations
16.
Watt, Amber M., Alun Cameron, Lana Sturm, et al.. (2008). RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 78(11). 1037–1040. 136 indexed citations
17.
Barber, Claire, Amber M. Watt, Clarabelle T. Pham, et al.. (2008). Influence of bioengineered skin substitutes on diabetic foot ulcer and venous leg ulcer outcomes. Journal of Wound Care. 17(12). 517–527. 29 indexed citations
18.
Watt, Amber M., Alun Cameron, Lana Sturm, et al.. (2008). Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 24(2). 133–139. 174 indexed citations
19.
Watt, Amber M., et al.. (2007). Self-expanding Metallic Stents for Relieving Malignant Colorectal Obstruction. Annals of Surgery. 246(1). 24–30. 302 indexed citations
20.
Watt, Amber M., et al.. (2007). Scalpel safety in the operative setting. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by YunKyung Chang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miriam E. Adams Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lucy Brindle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul Brocklehurst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Keith Meadows Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Justin W. Timbie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Neil R. Bell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leila Rooshenas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danielle C. Lavallee
Rankless by CCL
2026