Daisuke Koshiyama
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kiyoto KasaiTsuyoshi ArakiKenji KiriharaMariko TadaMao FujiokaGregory A. LightYash B. JoshiJoyce Sprock
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (29 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Daisuke Koshiyama
52 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 930
- Psychiatry and Mental health 293
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 168
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 167
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
Countries citing papers authored by Daisuke Koshiyama
This map shows the geographic impact of Daisuke Koshiyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daisuke Koshiyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daisuke Koshiyama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daisuke Koshiyama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daisuke Koshiyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daisuke Koshiyama. The network helps show where Daisuke Koshiyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daisuke Koshiyama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daisuke Koshiyama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daisuke Koshiyama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daisuke Koshiyama. Daisuke Koshiyama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 63 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Daisuke Koshiyama
Daisuke Koshiyama is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (29 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (930 citations), Biological Psychiatry (49 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (293 citations). Daisuke Koshiyama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Kiyoto Kasai, Tsuyoshi Araki, Kenji Kirihara, Mariko Tada, Mao Fujioka, Gregory A. Light, Yash B. Joshi, Joyce Sprock, Tatsuya Nagai and David Braff. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Scientific Reports and Cerebral Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.