Michael Jones
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Ecology
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Marlin L. BowlesKevin SeppiFlorian DaiberDan R. OlsenJacob SorberJonna HäkkiläKeith CheverstEric G. Hintz
- Topics
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers)Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers)Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEcological ApplicationsCopeia
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Jones
61 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 133
- Human-Computer Interaction 114
- Ecology 110
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 68
- Plant Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Jones. The network helps show where Michael Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Jones. Michael Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | The Hard Truth about Soft Skills: What Recruiters Look for in Business Graduates | 36 |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | Recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) Classifiers in a Planetarium Using a Head-Mounted Display | 1 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | Continued Testing of Head-Mounted Displays for Deaf Education in a Planetarium | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Guided model checking with a Bayesian meta-heuristic | 11 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Michael Jones
Michael Jones is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Software and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 65 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (114 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (133 citations) and Software (41 citations). Michael Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marlin L. Bowles, Kevin Seppi, Florian Daiber, Dan R. Olsen, Jacob Sorber, Jonna Häkkilä, Keith Cheverst, Eric G. Hintz, Kent Seamons and B. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecological Applications and Copeia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.