Michael J. Williams
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Hepatology top 1%
- Surgery top 10%
- Immunology and Allergy top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stuart J. ForbesAndrew D. CloustonXiaoping YangMark H. GinsbergSantiago Uribe‐LewisAdele MurrellMartin BachmanShankar Balasubramanian
- Topics
- Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers)Liver physiology and pathology (7 papers)Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe LancetJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Williams
37 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Hepatology 618
- Surgery 464
- Immunology and Allergy 451
- Epidemiology 347
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Williams. The network helps show where Michael J. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Williams. Michael J. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Hepatic progenitor cells of biliary origin with liver repopulation capacitybreakdown → | 345 |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 132 | |
| 7 | 231 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 152 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Michael J. Williams
Michael J. Williams is a scholar working on Hepatology, Immunology and Allergy and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (7 papers) and Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (618 citations), Immunology and Allergy (451 citations) and Hematology (200 citations). Michael J. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Stuart J. Forbes, Andrew D. Clouston, Xiaoping Yang, Mark H. Ginsberg, Santiago Uribe‐Lewis, Adele Murrell, Martin Bachman, Shankar Balasubramanian, Timothy E. O’Toole and Paul E. Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.