Mark Dunn

12 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Mark Dunn
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Toxicology 44
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 8
  • Emergency Medicine 13
  • Clinical Psychology 30
Replace Stefanie Geith with:
Stefanie Geith Germany
Lene Jarlbæk Denmark
Neeraj Chhabra United States
Ishraq Dhaifalah Czechia
Chin Wen Tan Singapore
Kulbir Mann United Kingdom
Chiara Filipponi Italy
Santiago Alvarez‐Arango United States
Erika MacIntyre Canada
Hanne H. Villesen Denmark
Mark Dunn relative to Stefanie Geith Germany Stefanie Geith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stefanie Geith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dunn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dunn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dunn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dunn. The network helps show where Mark Dunn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Mark Dunn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Dunn Line = papers co-authored together Mark Dunn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200769
2 199951
3 201346
4 200430
5 20138
6 19978
7 20208
8
Student achievement in England : results in reading, mathematical and scientific literacy among 15-year-olds from OECD PISA 2000 study
20027
9 20115
10 20195
11 20204
12 20193
13 20230

About Mark Dunn

Mark Dunn is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Foreign Body Medical Cases (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1 paper) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (44 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (8 citations), Emergency Medicine (13 citations) and Clinical Psychology (30 citations). Mark Dunn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Deborah K. Dunn‐Walters, Jo Spencer, Steve Cunningham, R.J. Prescott, Kenneth E. Ferslew, Dermot W. McKeown, Colin E. Robertson, Alasdair Gray, Matthew J. Reed and Louise Rennie. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Emergency Medicine, The Journal of Pediatrics, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Forensic Sciences and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact