Michael Irvin Arrington
- Oncology
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marsha L. VanderfordCharles GrantJohn L. RomanoErin M. BuckleyShasha BaiBeatrice E. GeeSeung Yup LeeKyle R. Cowdrick
- Topics
- Media Influence and Health (4 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers)Family Support in Illness (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesOncologyCommunication
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Irvin Arrington
17 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Oncology 109
- Sociology and Political Science 86
- General Health Professions 75
- Social Psychology 64
- Gender Studies 60
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Irvin Arrington
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Irvin Arrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Irvin Arrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Irvin Arrington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Irvin Arrington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Irvin Arrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Irvin Arrington. The network helps show where Michael Irvin Arrington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Irvin Arrington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Irvin Arrington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Irvin Arrington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Irvin Arrington. Michael Irvin Arrington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Doorway Thoughts: Cross-Cultural Health Care for Older Adults | 5 |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | Activist Counseling for Academically Underprepared University Students. | 1 |
About Michael Irvin Arrington
Michael Irvin Arrington is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 19 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers) and Family Support in Illness (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (60 citations), Oncology (109 citations) and Communication (25 citations). Michael Irvin Arrington has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marsha L. Vanderford, Charles Grant, John L. Romano, Erin M. Buckley, Shasha Bai, Beatrice E. Gee, Seung Yup Lee and Kyle R. Cowdrick. Their work appears in journals such as Biomedical Optics Express, Health Communication and Communication Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.