Emma‐Jane Sayers

611 total citations
10 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Emma‐Jane Sayers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma‐Jane Sayers has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emma‐Jane Sayers's work include Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers). Emma‐Jane Sayers is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers). Emma‐Jane Sayers collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Emma‐Jane Sayers's co-authors include Miles Little, Christopher F. C. Jordens, Kim Paul, Kathleen Montgomery, Ian Kerridge, J. M. Little and Steven Collins and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Psycho-Oncology and Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emma‐Jane Sayers

9 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma‐Jane Sayers Australia	7	111	96	93	88	71	10	370
Kim Paul Australia	6	81 0.7×	66 0.7×	87 0.9×	87 1.0×	70 1.0×	7	333
Ruvanee P. Vilhauer United States	9	85 0.8×	119 1.2×	82 0.9×	46 0.5×	33 0.5×	13	292
Servet Aker Türkiye	13	130 1.2×	78 0.8×	83 0.9×	75 0.9×	82 1.2×	38	556
Michael Irvin Arrington United States	10	86 0.8×	109 1.1×	75 0.8×	36 0.4×	44 0.6×	19	271
Kathleen Vanheusden Netherlands	12	123 1.1×	64 0.7×	60 0.6×	41 0.5×	41 0.6×	15	430
Hannah Matthews United Kingdom	14	124 1.1×	102 1.1×	146 1.6×	59 0.7×	79 1.1×	33	702
Hans Schilderman Netherlands	14	174 1.6×	50 0.5×	52 0.6×	185 2.1×	25 0.4×	40	497
Francine Conway United States	14	123 1.1×	136 1.4×	72 0.8×	30 0.3×	105 1.5×	30	503
Sónia Silva Portugal	10	149 1.3×	213 2.2×	52 0.6×	66 0.8×	32 0.5×	31	449
Akke Albada Netherlands	11	64 0.6×	78 0.8×	259 2.8×	99 1.1×	64 0.9×	17	489

Countries citing papers authored by Emma‐Jane Sayers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma‐Jane Sayers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma‐Jane Sayers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma‐Jane Sayers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma‐Jane Sayers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma‐Jane Sayers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma‐Jane Sayers. The network helps show where Emma‐Jane Sayers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma‐Jane Sayers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma‐Jane Sayers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma‐Jane Sayers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma‐Jane Sayers. Emma‐Jane Sayers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Little, Miles, Christopher F. C. Jordens, & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (2022). Discourse Communities and the Discourse of Experience. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 19(1). 61–69. 2 indexed citations

2.

Little, Miles & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (2004). While there's life …. Social Science & Medicine. 59(6). 1329–1337. 69 indexed citations

3.

Little, Miles & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (2003). The skull beneath the skin: Cancer survival and awareness of death. Psycho-Oncology. 13(3). 190–198. 29 indexed citations

4.

Kerridge, Ian, Christopher F. C. Jordens, Emma‐Jane Sayers, & J. M. Little. (2003). Restoring Humane Values to Medicine: A Miles Little Reader. 2 indexed citations

5.

Little, Miles, Christopher F. C. Jordens, & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (2003). Discourse Communities and the Discourse of Experience. Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine. 7(1). 73–86. 38 indexed citations

6.

Little, Miles, et al.. (2002). Survivorship and discourses of identity. Psycho-Oncology. 11(2). 170–178. 137 indexed citations

7.

Little, Miles, et al.. (2002). Discourse in different voices: reconciling N=1 and N=many. Social Science & Medicine. 55(7). 1079–1087. 25 indexed citations

8.

Jordens, Christopher F. C., et al.. (2001). Life disruption and generic complexity: a social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine. 53(9). 1227–1236. 43 indexed citations

9.

Little, Miles, Kim Paul, Christopher F. C. Jordens, & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (2000). Vulnerability in the Narratives of Patients and their Carers: Studies of Colorectal Cancer. Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine. 4(4). 495–510. 24 indexed citations

10.

Collins, Steven & Emma‐Jane Sayers. (1997). Discharge summaries. Map reading.. PubMed. 107(5555). 28–9. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact