MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA

508 citations
9 papers · 310 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA

9 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 123
  • Developmental Neuroscience 42
  • Emergency Medicine 79
  • Surgery 187
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
Replace S Piepenbrock with:
S Piepenbrock Germany
Jyotsna Wig India
Elisabetta Lampugnani Italy
Claude Saint-Maurice France
Remziye Sıvacı Türkiye
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy United States
Oranuch Kyokong Thailand
Aykut Urfalıoğlu Türkiye
Jochen Strauß Germany
Fengling Jin Canada
MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA relative to S Piepenbrock Germany S Piepenbrock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
S Piepenbrock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA. The network helps show where MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA Line = papers co-authored together MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 198564
2 199357
3 199355
4 199345
5 200228
6 199320
7 200718
8 198017
9 19956

About MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA

MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper) and Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (123 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (42 citations), Emergency Medicine (79 citations), Surgery (187 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations). MICHAEL E. OʼMEARA has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tony Gin, Peggy Tan, G. YAU, Timothy G. Short, T. E. Oh, Rita Yn Tz Sung, C. Aun, David V. Feliciano, Michael E. DeBakey and Kenneth L. Mattox. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Eye and Southern Medical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact