Michael Desmond

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Desmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Biochemistry 428
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 293
  • Internal Medicine 56
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 89
  • Emergency Medicine 118
Replace Tae‐Yop Kim with:
Tae‐Yop Kim South Korea
Christoph Kaufmann United States
Stefano A. Bini United States
Michael J. Scott United States
Magnus Åberg Sweden
Robert J.M. Klautz Netherlands
Hiroyuki Yoshihara Japan
Raimondo Ascione United Kingdom
Shigeyuki Matsui Japan
Lei Du China
Michael Desmond relative to Tae‐Yop Kim South Korea Tae‐Yop Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Tae‐Yop Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Desmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Desmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Desmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Desmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Desmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Desmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Desmond. The network helps show where Michael Desmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Desmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Desmond Line = papers co-authored together Michael Desmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005217
2
Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs
2011214
3 2004183
4 199782
5 199469
6 201868
7 199663
8 202147
9 199645
10 199644
11 201444
12 202126
13 201125
14 198324
15 201821
16 201020
17 199419
18 198818
19 200616
20 201016

About Michael Desmond

Michael Desmond is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, Surgery, Biochemistry and Information Systems, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (9 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (9 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (7 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (6 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (428 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (293 citations), Internal Medicine (56 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (89 citations) and Emergency Medicine (118 citations). Michael Desmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Antony D. Grayson, J. Gillon, D. Mark Pullan, Shishir Karthik, Manoj Kuduvalli, B. M. Fabri, Azhar Rashid, Justin Davis, Michael Berk and Mark Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Transfusion, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact