Richard D. Page
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen H. PennefatherMichael ShackclothAdrian CassidyJonathan P. MylesTriantafillos LiloglouStephen W. DuffyJohn K. FieldMartie van Tongeren
- Topics
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (10 papers)Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers)Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Richard D. Page
43 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 911
- Surgery 669
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 258
- Oncology 210
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 143
Countries citing papers authored by Richard D. Page
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard D. Page's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard D. Page with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard D. Page more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard D. Page
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard D. Page. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard D. Page. The network helps show where Richard D. Page may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard D. Page
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard D. Page. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard D. Page based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard D. Page. Richard D. Page is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 314 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 103 |
About Richard D. Page
Richard D. Page is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (10 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers) and Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (911 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (87 citations) and Surgery (669 citations). Richard D. Page has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Stephen H. Pennefather, Michael Shackcloth, Adrian Cassidy, Jonathan P. Myles, Triantafillos Liloglou, Stephen W. Duffy, John K. Field, Martie van Tongeren, Raymund J. Donnelly and Glenn N. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, British Journal of Cancer and Thorax.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.