Michael Day
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Fire effects on ecosystems
Papers in
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 14
-
- Forest ecology and management 4
- Seedling growth and survival studies 3
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Michael S. GreenwoodAlan S. WhiteRobert G. WagnerShawn FraverCarmen Díaz‐SalaB. J. BondIvan J. FernandezG. B. Wiersma
- Journals
- Tree Physiology (7 papers)Forest Ecology and Management (4 papers)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (3 papers)HortScience (3 papers)Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSlovakiaIreland
In The Last Decade
Michael Day
23 papers receiving 839 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 383
- Global and Planetary Change 517
- Plant Science 434
- Atmospheric Science 205
- Insect Science 120
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Day. The network helps show where Michael Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 72 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 56 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 114 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 131 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 141 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 112 |
About Michael Day
Michael Day is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Atmospheric Science and Cell Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (14 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (4 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (383 citations), Global and Planetary Change (517 citations), Plant Science (434 citations), Atmospheric Science (205 citations) and Insect Science (120 citations). Michael Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Greenwood, Alan S. White, Robert G. Wagner, Shawn Fraver, Carmen Díaz‐Sala, B. J. Bond, Ivan J. Fernandez, G. B. Wiersma, C. M. Cooper and María A. Equiza. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, HortScience and Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.