Michael D. Hills
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Health
- Co-authors
- Elisha BabadMichael O’DriscollPeter G. BakerIryna KorshunovaGregory A. WorrellBrian LittSimone C. BosshardMin Chen
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers)Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- New ZealandMalaysiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael D. Hills
15 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Psychiatry and Mental health 278
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 182
- Cognitive Neuroscience 172
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 50
- Health 45
Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Hills
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Hills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Hills
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Hills. The network helps show where Michael D. Hills may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael D. Hills
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael D. Hills. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael D. Hills based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael D. Hills. Michael D. Hills is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 190 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | Overcoming the stigma of epilepsy | 7 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | The psychological and social impact of epilepsy | 28 |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Reducing discrimination against people with epilepsy in New Zealand | 4 |
| 11 | 97 | |
| 12 | 94 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | High school students' attitudes towards and use of contraceptives. | 5 |
About Michael D. Hills
Michael D. Hills is a scholar working on Health, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (278 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (182 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (172 citations). Michael D. Hills has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Malaysia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elisha Babad, Michael O’Driscoll, Peter G. Baker, Iryna Korshunova, Gregory A. Worrell, Brian Litt, Simone C. Bosshard, Min Chen, Francisco Javier Muñoz–Almaraz and Benjamin H. Brinkmann. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Epilepsia and Disability and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.